National Chengchi University - NCU vs Polytechnic University Institute Bamenda - NPB vs University of Bamenda - Uba vs Universidade Aberta - UAb vs Catholic University of Cameroon

Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Polytechnic University Institute Bamenda - NPB (4.80)
National Chengchi University - NCU: wins 3/6 categories
Polytechnic University Institute Bamenda - NPB: wins 0/6 categories
University of Bamenda - Uba: wins 0/6 categories
Universidade Aberta - UAb: wins 3/6 categories
Catholic University of Cameroon: wins 0/6 categories
Saint Louis University - Salusis: wins 0/6 categories
Bangladesh Army University of Science and Technology - BAUST: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.89
Not rated
3.60
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.67
Not rated
3.93
4.10
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.33
Win
Not rated
4.19
4.23
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
4.56
Win
Not rated
3.81
4.15
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.33
Not rated
4.33
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.44
Win
Not rated
4.19
4.38
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.78
Not rated
3.75
3.89
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse academic programs and flexibility for exploration
  • +Dedicated and professional professors with high-quality teaching
  • +Strong focus on social sciences, business, and international affairs
  • +Supportive and skilled staff providing academic and social guidance
  • +High-quality teaching and enthusiastic professors
  • +Affordable tuition and practical internship support
  • +Dedicated lecturers and strong academic programs
  • +Engaging learning environment with hands-on projects and extracurriculars
  • +Friendly, diverse atmosphere promoting culture and socialization
  • +Excellent facilities, well-located campus, and a strong sense of community.
  • +Flexible distance learning model with high academic quality and well-qualified faculty.
  • +Practical and professional focus in programs, preparing students for the future.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and dedicated faculty
  • +Disciplined academic environment
  • +Structured routines and focus on learning
Cons
  • -Students dislike the significant administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a major concern.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and unclear career relevance is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication problems and poor faculty engagement are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are often criticized.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are sometimes seen as ineffective or unengaging.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum or teaching quality is often perceived as subpar or not engaging.
Rating summary
What students say

Remarkably high marks were achieved in several key areas, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest at 4.56. **Value** and **Student Life** also scored exceptionally well, both above 4.33. **Professors** received a strong rating of 4.33. **Facilities** represent the lowest rated aspect, coming in at 3.89, though still a respectable score. **Location** and **Accomodation** fall in the mid-range of the provided data.

With identical ratings across all assessed categories, the university presents a uniform, though unexceptional, profile. No specific area stands out as particularly strong or weak. The institution's performance in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value is consistent, indicating a neutral standing across the board. Further review would be needed to understand the nuances behind these equal scores.

This institution presents a varied performance profile, with Student Life standing out as its strongest area, achieving a score of 4.33. Professors and Value also scored highly at 4.19. Conversely, Facilities received the lowest rating at 3.6, indicating this might be an area for improvement. Other aspects like Location, Internationality, and Accommodation fall within a respectable middle range.

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with its strongest area being **Value**, earning a 4.38. **Professors** also received high marks. The **Accomodation** category received the lowest rating at 3.89, suggesting this is the area for potential improvement, though other aspects like Facilities and Student Life remain solid.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates a mixed performance across various metrics. Its strongest areas are Location and Value, both receiving a rating of 4. Professors and Internationality also score reasonably well with a 3. Conversely, Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation received the lowest possible rating of 0, indicating significant areas for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 10 reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students highlight a strong academic atmosphere, diverse course offerings, and supportive professors, particularly in social sciences and business. The campus environment and opportunities for exploration are also praised.

With a 4.75/5 average from 4 reviews, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise staff encouragement, good professors, and teaching quality, highlighting opportunities for academic and social growth.

With a 4.25/5 average rating, ~94% of reviews are positive. Students highlight strong academic programs and collaborative lecturers. Minor concerns mentioned include infrastructure and administrative issues.

With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 13 reviews, ~85% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent facilities, wonderful teachers, and the convenience of distance learning, fostering a supportive community and preparing them for the future. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review received, the university has an average rating of 4/5 stars. The feedback highlighted a disciplined and academically focused environment, with sincere and dedicated faculty. Negative feedback was not present.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
75%
38%
54%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
25%
50%
31%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
13%
15%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Low tuition fees university

Affordable university and here if you are not able to have a place for practical work internship, the school can help you with an internship placement at any of the available companies in the region. Also, i was able to learn a new language ( French ).

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close