The University of Hong Kong - HKU vs City University of Hong Kong - CityU vs The Hong Kong Polytechnic University - PolyU vs Hong Kong Metropolitan University - HKMU vs ESEUNE Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 45 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent academic quality and teaching by profound scholars.
- +Vibrant campus life with global students and international cultures.
- +Strong career enhancement through industry exposure and mentorship.
- +Strong program depth and regional focus
- +Experienced and helpful faculty mentorship
- +Practical skills and real-world experience opportunities
- +World-class programs and practical learning
- +Extensive internship and career opportunities
- +Vibrant campus life and convenient location
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Flexible and suitable academic schedules
- +Positive and engaging learning environment
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Calm study spaces and good environment
- +Quality teaching and learning experience
- +Kind and genuine people
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Overcrowding and lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and feedback is a consistent problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities are a significant concern.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or not up-to-date.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of campus space are disappointing.
- -Low university ranking and poor professor English proficiency are major concerns.
- -Inconsistent attendance policies create a less engaging academic environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
This institution receives high marks for its **location**, which scored a 4.44. Other strong areas include **facilities** (4.375), **professors** (4.333), and **value** (4.333). Areas scoring lower are **student life** (3.889) and **accommodation** (3.778), indicating these might be opportunities for improvement. **Internationality** also received a solid rating of 4.222.
With outstanding marks in **Professors, Location, and Value (all 5/5)**, this institution excels in key areas. Student life and accommodation also receive very high scores (4.8/5). Facilities are rated well at 4/5, while Internationality stands out as the relatively weakest area, though still strong at 4.2/5.
This institution garners positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Location** with a score of 4.91. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also received strong ratings at 4.45. Areas rated slightly lower include **Professors** and **Accomodation** at 4.36, and **Internationality** at 4.27. The university demonstrates a good overall value, scoring 4.55.
This institution receives commendable scores in several key areas, with its **Facilities and Professors** standing out as particular strengths. **Location** also scores well. However, **Student Life** and **Accomodation** present areas for improvement, alongside **Internationality**. The overall **Value** is rated moderately.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its Facilities and Accommodations. The University also received strong ratings for its Location and overall Value. Student Life, while rated adequately, represents the area with the most room for improvement, scoring a 3. Internationality also stands out positively with a perfect score.
Nearly all student feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.41/5. Students highlight excellent academics and dedicated professors, fostering personal growth. Campus life is described as vibrant and supportive.
All ten reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the university's strong programs, experienced faculty, and practical learning opportunities like internships and exchange programs.
With ~83% positive feedback and an average of 4.5/5, reviews highlight strong academic quality, professional advantages, and diverse campus life with ample opportunities. No negative feedback was provided.
With ~83% positive reviews, students highlight helpful professors, good teacher-student relationships, and a positive learning atmosphere. A smaller ~17% of feedback mentioned low English proficiency for some professors and limited campus facilities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The sole reviewer found the university environment good, with calm study spaces and effective teaching. A slight lack of communication was noted, but kindness and genuineness were appreciated.
This opinion is made in respect of the Master of Law in Human Rights programme at HKU only ("Programme"). The Law Department offers its students many opportunities to be involved in extracurricular initiatives. For instance, the academic staff often hire student researchers and the Center for Comparative and Public Law frequently seek volunteers to assist in their seminars and conferences. One of the Programme's most notable opportunities is a grant with Open Society Foundations called the 'rights and governance internship'. The Law Department also has innovative street law and clinic initiatives. Further, many of its academic staff are legal practitioners and integrate anecdotes from their practices in the classroom, which is both interesting and beneficial to the learning environment. The class sizes are intimate and allow for in-depth discussions. The elective selection could be broader (the electives are also subject to last minute changes) and the compulsory courses are not the best-fitted for all students. Since the Programme accepts students without a law degree, it is sometimes difficult to reconcile the different backgrounds and meaningfully begin a legal discussion. Some students are in the Programme for the purpose of getting an 'easy' masters-level law degree. Overall, the Programme is terrific if you are proactive in seeking opportunities to advance your studies and pave a path for your next steps. You can build strong networks. Students entering with a more passive mindset may be disappointed with the experience though.
Nothing to show
I SKIP CLASSES! I'm currently enrolled at the hong kong polytechnic university.... That is how my review should start rationally, right? But, here is a thing - I'm enrolled in the university and the last time I have been to lectures was half a year ago! It is supposed to be my 2nd year now, but due to the protests, coronavirus I'm on the online teaching for half a year!!!
The lowest university rank in Hong Kong. Some professor English level is extremely low. You don’t feel like this is a university because they lack of campus facility with only two huge buildings for the students. Most of the student just come here to go to class and then usually directly go back home. The school is quite flexible because they don't take any attendance in my major. The only advantage for me is the university is in Hong Kong. That's it !
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university is really a known place. What I like about the uni is the study space is calm, and the environment is good. The study also taught me very well. What is disliked is it was a lack of communication between one another, but everyone was very kind and genuine.
