The University of Hong Kong - HKU vs Hong Kong Baptist University - BU vs The Hong Kong Polytechnic University - PolyU vs The Education University of Hong Kong - EdUHK vs Hong Kong Metropolitan University - HKMU
Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent academic quality and teaching by profound scholars.
- +Vibrant campus life with global students and international cultures.
- +Strong career enhancement through industry exposure and mentorship.
- +Modern facilities and friendly international community
- +Diverse program options and specialized learning
- +Opportunities for exchange programs and community service
- +World-class programs and practical learning
- +Extensive internship and career opportunities
- +Vibrant campus life and convenient location
- +Strong professor support and global opportunities
- +Pathway for aspiring teachers in Asian regions
- +Accessible and experienced lecturers with strong industry connections.
- +Affordable tuition and ample financial aid opportunities.
- +Positive and supportive campus atmosphere with flexible schedules.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Overcrowding and lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant problems.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication is consistently poor and unhelpful.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities are a significant concern.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or not up-to-date.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unclear communication.
- -Lack of support and resources for students.
- -Outdated facilities and low university ranking are major drawbacks.
- -Poor English proficiency among some professors hinders learning.
- -Lack of campus atmosphere and strict policies are disliked.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution receives high marks for its **location**, which scored a 4.44. Other strong areas include **facilities** (4.375), **professors** (4.333), and **value** (4.333). Areas scoring lower are **student life** (3.889) and **accommodation** (3.778), indicating these might be opportunities for improvement. **Internationality** also received a solid rating of 4.222.
This institution exhibits a robust and highly positive overall rating profile. Its strongest areas, with near-perfect scores, are Student Life and Internationality, closely followed by an excellent Facilities rating. The weakest area, while still respectable, is Professors, which stands at 3.75 out of 5. Other categories like Location, Accomodation, and Value also received strong marks, indicating a generally well-regarded university experience.
This institution garners positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Location** with a score of 4.91. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also received strong ratings at 4.45. Areas rated slightly lower include **Professors** and **Accomodation** at 4.36, and **Internationality** at 4.27. The university demonstrates a good overall value, scoring 4.55.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value**, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. These areas suggest a well-equipped campus, quality instruction, a desirable setting, and good return on investment. Conversely, **Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality** are rated slightly lower at 3, indicating there may be room for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.
Overall, the university receives generally positive evaluations. It excels in its **Professors** and **Facilities**, both scoring well. The **Location** and **Value** are also considered strong points. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving the lowest rating, with **Internationality** and **Student Life** also performing moderately.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nearly all student feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.41/5. Students highlight excellent academics and dedicated professors, fostering personal growth. Campus life is described as vibrant and supportive.
All 5 reviews are positive, rating the university 4/5 stars. Students highlight a modern campus with good facilities, a friendly international community, and beneficial exchange programs. Some found certain classes unengaging, but overall experiences were positive.
With ~83% positive feedback and an average of 4.5/5, reviews highlight strong academic quality, professional advantages, and diverse campus life with ample opportunities. No negative feedback was provided.
This university has a 4/5 average rating, with 100% of feedback being positive. Reviews highlight responsible and knowledgeable professors, as well as good global connections offering exchange and internship opportunities.
Nearly all reviews (~86%) are positive, praising approachable lecturers, affordable tuition, and a diverse student body. A small percentage (~14%) notes low English proficiency from some professors and limited campus facilities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This opinion is made in respect of the Master of Law in Human Rights programme at HKU only ("Programme"). The Law Department offers its students many opportunities to be involved in extracurricular initiatives. For instance, the academic staff often hire student researchers and the Center for Comparative and Public Law frequently seek volunteers to assist in their seminars and conferences. One of the Programme's most notable opportunities is a grant with Open Society Foundations called the 'rights and governance internship'. The Law Department also has innovative street law and clinic initiatives. Further, many of its academic staff are legal practitioners and integrate anecdotes from their practices in the classroom, which is both interesting and beneficial to the learning environment. The class sizes are intimate and allow for in-depth discussions. The elective selection could be broader (the electives are also subject to last minute changes) and the compulsory courses are not the best-fitted for all students. Since the Programme accepts students without a law degree, it is sometimes difficult to reconcile the different backgrounds and meaningfully begin a legal discussion. Some students are in the Programme for the purpose of getting an 'easy' masters-level law degree. Overall, the Programme is terrific if you are proactive in seeking opportunities to advance your studies and pave a path for your next steps. You can build strong networks. Students entering with a more passive mindset may be disappointed with the experience though.
Nothing to show
I SKIP CLASSES! I'm currently enrolled at the hong kong polytechnic university.... That is how my review should start rationally, right? But, here is a thing - I'm enrolled in the university and the last time I have been to lectures was half a year ago! It is supposed to be my 2nd year now, but due to the protests, coronavirus I'm on the online teaching for half a year!!!
Nothing to show
The lowest university rank in Hong Kong. Some professor English level is extremely low. You don’t feel like this is a university because they lack of campus facility with only two huge buildings for the students. Most of the student just come here to go to class and then usually directly go back home. The school is quite flexible because they don't take any attendance in my major. The only advantage for me is the university is in Hong Kong. That's it !
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
