Roanoke College vs Burgundy School of Business vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT vs APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University - APJAKTU vs Structuralia
Side-by-side comparison from 67 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging, small classes and excellent education quality
- +Beautiful natural setting and outdoor activities
- +Supportive community and positive overall experience
- +Experienced and approachable instructors
- +Practical, relevant curriculum
- +Supportive environment and good location
- +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
- +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
- +Expert faculty and enriching academic environment
- +Focus on practical learning and real-world preparation
- +Positive campus atmosphere and enjoyable student experience
- +Highly relevant and engaging curriculum
- +Excellent faculty expertise and teaching quality
- +Strong career support and industry connections
Nothing to show
- +Welcoming and supportive international environment
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +Well-structured programs with practical relevance
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching and curriculum are noted.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder program quality.
- -Program value is not commensurate with the high tuition fees.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt the learning environment.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
- -Lack of essential resources and support services is a significant problem.
- -Lack of timely and helpful academic support and feedback.
- -Issues with administrative processes and unclear communication regarding policies.
- -Outdated course materials and poor quality of instruction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Inflexible policies and poor communication create frustration.
Exceptional marks were awarded across all surveyed aspects of the institution. Strengths are evident in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all receiving perfect scores. No specific weaknesses were identified, indicating a consistently high-quality experience in every evaluated area.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks at 4.44. Professors and student life also scored very well, both at 4.22. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 3.56 and 3.63 respectively. The university shows a moderate performance in internationality and value.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.
This university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, particularly with professors, student life, accommodation, and value, all receiving high marks. Location also scores well. However, facilities are rated moderately, and internationality stands out as the weakest area. Overall, students appear to be satisfied with most aspects of their experience, with some notable exceptions.
Across all assessed aspects, this institution demonstrates a uniform performance. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality all received identical ratings. Similarly, the value proposition of the university is rated precisely the same as its other components. No specific area stands out as a strength or weakness, as all are consistently evaluated at the same level.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring an impressive 4.22. **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, and **Value** also receive positive marks, generally above 4. The weakest area identified is **Internationality**, with a score of 3.67, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. **Professors** also received a respectable but comparatively lower rating at 3.89.
With two positive reviews and an average rating of 5/5, student feedback is highly favorable. No negative feedback was received.
The majority of reviews (~89%) are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, practical courses, and a supportive environment. A small amount of negative feedback (~11%) exists, with one reviewer feeling the cost was not justified.
With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.
University reviews are predominantly positive, with ~71% of feedback being highly favorable. Recurring positive themes include faculty expertise, practical learning focus, and campus environment. A minor point notes a preference for theoretical over practical learning in some programs.
Based on a single review with a 1/5 rating, ~100% of feedback is negative. The student highlights a lack of promised tutor interaction and support, experiencing the opposite of the advertised course delivery.
Nothing to show
With a 4.33/5 average rating from 9 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, a welcoming international environment, and well-structured programs. Limited administrative speed and career support were mentioned.
Nothing to show
As an international student attending the MBA WINE AND SPIRITS BUSINESS program and spending 32 thousand euros (besides the need of quitting my job, move, find an accommodation and change lifestyle) I would say that the school is worth less then half of what it costs. The only good aspects of it are the big students’ communities, the commitment of the international office and the quality of some teachers who cannot really give their best because they’re hampered by the strict organisation of the school programs. Administration, services and the overall school organisation are really below expectations and the educational level is just average despite the cost and the “reputation”. Everyone (classmates, other international students and french ones from all courses and years) complained about the fact that “the school used to be a good one, but now is just bad”!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
