Central European University - CEU vs University of Szeged vs ESSCA School of Management vs Budapest Metropolitan University vs University of Pécs

Side-by-side comparison from 143 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Central European University - CEU: wins 1/7 categories
University of Szeged: wins 2/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Budapest Metropolitan University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Pécs: wins 2/7 categories
Edutus University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Pécs Faculty of Business and Economics: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Philosophy
Szeged, Hungary
4.40
Read more reviews
19 reviews
×
Best programme: Agricultural Engineering
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Animation
Best programme: Psychology
Budapest, Hungary
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: BSc Business Administration & Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.56
4.00
3.73
3.33
4.18
Not rated
4.22
Win
Location
3.44
4.29
4.14
3.33
4.44
Win
Not rated
4.38
Professors
4.22
4.32
Win
3.90
3.67
4.14
Not rated
4.25
Internationality
4.78
Win
4.26
3.87
4.00
4.53
Not rated
4.58
Student life
4.00
4.47
Win
4.07
3.00
4.44
Not rated
3.83
Value
3.78
4.16
3.70
3.33
4.26
Not rated
4.33
Win
Accommodation
3.75
3.74
3.37
3.00
4.19
Win
Not rated
4.09
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse student body and international perspective
  • +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
  • +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
  • +Strong academic programmes and learning support
  • +Approachable and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Welcoming and supportive international student environment
  • +Strong marketing & business programs
  • +Excellent student support & community
  • +Diverse academic pathways & practical experience
  • +Unique, broad, and exploratory learning approach
  • +Modern, open-minded environment
  • +Practical and theoretical course balance
  • +Approachable, experienced faculty
  • +Supportive, multicultural community

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive professors and career focus
  • +Diverse and international student community
  • +Practical and real-world learning opportunities
Cons
  • -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
  • -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency cause confusion and dissatisfaction.
  • -Unprepared and unhelpful professors with poor communication.
  • -Irrelevant and outdated courses with a lack of student engagement.
  • -Significant administrative and organizational issues.
  • -Lack of practical skills and real-world application in the curriculum.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment create a poor learning environment.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and inefficient management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of accessible and timely support exacerbates student difficulties.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources create difficulties.
  • -A lack of clear communication and support from staff is frustrating.
Rating summary
What students say

Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.

Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across several key areas. Student Life is a clear standout, achieving the highest rating. Professors and Internationality also receive strong marks. However, Accommodations present the weakest area, with a comparatively lower score. Facilities, Location, and Value fall within the generally positive range.

This institution presents a mixed picture in its evaluations. It shines brightest in **Location**, achieving a score of over 4.1, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.07 and **Professors** at 3.9. Conversely, **Accomodation** is its least favored aspect, with a rating of 3.37. The university also garners solid marks in Internationality and Value.

This university presents a generally positive but mixed picture. Its strongest areas include Internationality, scoring a solid 4. Professors also received a commendable rating of 3.67. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation are its weakest points, both averaging a 3. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated moderately at 3.33.

This institution garners excellent marks in key areas, with Internationality standing out at 4.53, closely followed by Location (4.44) and Student Life (4.44). Value for money is also highly rated at 4.26. While Facilities and Accommodations also score well (around 4.18), Professors received slightly lower, though still strong, feedback at 4.14.

Nothing to show

An analysis of the provided ratings reveals a generally positive university experience. The institution excels significantly in **Internationality**, scoring a high 4.58. **Location** and **Value** also received strong marks, both above 4.3. Conversely, **Student Life** emerged as the weakest area, rating at 3.83, indicating room for improvement in this aspect. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation received solid scores in the 4.0 to 4.2 range.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.

University of Szeged receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~84% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the diverse faculties, excellent library, and strong support for international students. There are no 1-2 star reviews.

With ~87% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.93/5, students praise good knowledge transfer, specialization options, internship access, and vibrant campus life. A small portion of reviews mention unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.

With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is mixed. Approximately 33% of reviews are negative, citing a lack of technical skills and real-world experience. Positive comments highlight the university's unique, modern, and open-minded approach.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~91%), highlighting a strong academic foundation with a practical and theoretical balance. Professors are praised for fairness, real-world experience, and approachability, creating a dynamic learning environment. Limited on-campus job opportunities were a minor concern.

Nothing to show

Nearly all of the 24 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.42/5. Students highly praise supportive professors, a strong student community, and practical learning opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

Rating distribution
5★
30%
53%
30%
0%
44%
0%
50%
4★
40%
32%
43%
33%
47%
0%
42%
3★
10%
16%
20%
33%
9%
0%
8%
2★
10%
0%
3%
33%
0%
0%
0%
1★
10%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Well-rounded programme

Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.

Nothing to show

Practical Hours/ Language Barrier

My honest opinion of PECS University has evolved significantly over the years. When I first started, I faced numerous challenges, including language barriers, a lack of lecturers who spoke English, and insufficient support for learning Hungarian, especially in my department. However, Pécs listened to our complaints and made strides to improve the situation. If someone had asked me whether I would recommend Pécs while I was still there, I would have said no. However, based on what I see now, I truly believe the improvements are worth giving it a chance. The university has enhanced its resources, offered more diverse course options, and fostered a more inclusive environment. It's also important to mention that Pécs is such a peaceful and serene city, which adds to the overall experience of studying there. If the opportunity arises for me to return for a master's degree, I would certainly consider it, as I believe the university is now better equipped to support its students' success. Overall, I appreciate PECS University's progress and look forward to seeing it grow.

Nothing to show

A Great place to learn and grow

My experience has been very positive. I particularly appreciate the supportive professors, diverse international student community, and the opportunities to develop both academically and personally. It offers a welcoming environment, and I would definitely recommend it to students looking for a quality and international study experience.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close