Central European University - CEU vs Vienna University of Economics and Business vs IBS International Business School - IBS vs Sigmund Freud University - SFU vs International College of Tourism and Management - ITM
Side-by-side comparison from 40 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse student body and international perspective
- +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
- +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
- +Excellent campus facilities and diverse program options.
- +Supportive faculty and staff providing accurate assistance.
- +Opportunities for specialized study and international experiences.
- +Diverse international student body and cultural exchange
- +Practical, real-world applicable knowledge and career opportunities
- +Excellent teaching staff and flexible class schedules
- +Expert and passionate professors
- +International study opportunities
- +Well-located campuses and student life
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
- -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates uncertainty for students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant problems.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from the institution is unclear and infrequent.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.
Across various aspects, this institution receives commendations in several key areas. Its **location stands out** as the highest-rated category, complemented by strong scores in **Internationality, Facilities, and Professors**. However, **Student Life is identified as the weakest area**, with Accomodation and Value also receiving moderate ratings.
This university garners impressive scores across multiple aspects. Internationality stands out as its strongest area, followed closely by professors and value. On the other hand, location and accommodation received the lowest ratings, though still within a generally positive range. Overall, student life and facilities also scored well, contributing to a solid academic profile.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its prime **location** and robust **internationality**, both scoring a perfect 5. Excellent **professors** (4.7) and **facilities** (4.3) also contribute to a positive academic environment. Areas for development include **student life** and **accommodation**, both rated at 3.7. The **value** proposition is solid at 4.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.
With an average rating of 4.13/5 from 8 reviews, ~88% of feedback is positive, praising the campus, program variety, and support. Negative feedback is minimal, representing ~0% of all comments.
With a 4.53/5 average, ~95% of reviews are positive. Students praise practical knowledge, real-world problem-solving, excellent teaching staff, and a curriculum preparing them for today's world. The international environment, diverse student body, and opportunities to understand different cultures are also frequently highlighted.
With a 4/5 average rating, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight passionate professors and the university's international opportunities. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
WU (German abbreviation derived from Wirtschaftsuniversität) is one of the best universities in Europe. One of the main aims of the university for the next years is to increase the number of international students. That is why they introduces a program fully in English. During the first application period the university received more than 1000 applications for only 120 places. I study at the German Bachelor's Program. It has three stages - STEOP, CBK and Hauptstudium. Every student who has chosen BWl/IBWL/WINF can specialize in 2 subjects. Most of the exams are standardized and there are enough materials for preparation. For some subjects there are even additional courses organized from ÖH (the student organization). There are special mentor programs, so take a look at ALL OF THEM even before applying to the university. You will be amazed how much the university supports its students. The administration is amazing. They always answer very fast and their answers are really helpful. If you want to work something connected with R or Data Science, this is your university. The campus is pretty new and really modern. In Vienna there are a lot of DISCOUNTS FOR STUDENTS AND PRESENTS during the WHOLE SEMESTER. Bank accounts are free of charge. You even may receive a bonus for opening a student bank account in Austria.
- Great University. - Great support system from teachers. - You will meet different nationalities. - Recommendable to anyone. I am a Master student in International Management. This course will help you later for working in Multinationals company and also management level.
I attended Sigmund Freud University during the academic years 2022-2023, and overall, my experience with the faculty was a mix of highs and lows. One thing that stood out positively was the incredible support and dedication shown by the faculty members. The professors at SFU were genuinely invested in their students' success and were always willing to help whenever students sought their guidance. They were approachable, knowledgeable, and went above and beyond to assist students in understanding the course material and academic concepts. However, despite the impressive support from the faculty, I must highlight that the organization at SFU could be improved. The overall system seemed to lack coordination, leading to certain aspects of academic life feeling unorganized. For instance, course schedules and syllabi were sometimes updated at the last minute, causing confusion among students. Additionally, administrative processes, such as course registration and academic advising, could have been smoother and better streamlined. Moreover, some professors struggled with managing their workload and appeared stressed at times, which impacted their ability to provide a consistent and structured learning environment. This lack of organization affected the overall learning experience and hindered students' ability to fully engage with the material. In conclusion, SFU is a place where students can expect a lot of support from faculty members who are passionate about teaching and willing to help. The dedication of the professors is commendable and greatly contributes to the positive learning environment. However, the university could benefit from implementing better organizational strategies to ensure a smoother academic experience for its students. Despite the areas that need improvement, the support and guidance received from the faculty make SFU a worthwhile institution for those seeking a strong support system throughout their academic journey.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
