Central European University - CEU vs University of Debrecen vs University of Szeged vs ESSCA School of Management vs Edutus University
Side-by-side comparison from 173 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse student body and international perspective
- +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
- +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
- +Engaging courses and intellectually stimulating curriculum
- +Approachable and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Beautiful campus and international student environment
- +Strong academic programmes and learning support
- +Approachable and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming and supportive international student environment
- +Supportive and approachable teachers and staff.
- +Valuable business knowledge and specialization opportunities.
- +Enjoyable campus life and enriching activities.
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and career-focused professors
- +Diverse and international student community
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Engaging instructors and inspiring teaching
- +Relevant and practical curriculum
- +Excellent career support and opportunities
- -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
- -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant student stress.
- -Lack of support, career counseling, and assistance with internships/jobs is a major drawback.
- -Quality of studies and academic support varies greatly by department, with some being subpar.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency cause confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Inadequate professors and poor organization
- -Expensive and irrelevant courses
- -Unmotivated student body
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Poor English proficiency of some professors hinders learning.
- -Lack of student support and care is a significant concern.
Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **Internationality**, earning a near-perfect score. **Facilities** also received a very high rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the area with the lowest score, though still above average. Other strong points include **Student Life**, **Professors**, and **Value**, all of which are well-regarded. **Location** is also a positive, albeit slightly lower than the other commendable aspects.
Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across several key areas. Student Life is a clear standout, achieving the highest rating. Professors and Internationality also receive strong marks. However, Accommodations present the weakest area, with a comparatively lower score. Facilities, Location, and Value fall within the generally positive range.
Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a generally positive academic environment. The university excels in **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.0. Professors also receive strong marks, reflecting a high quality of instruction. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. **Facilities** and **Value** indicate moderate satisfaction, while **Internationality** scores well, suggesting a diverse community.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Internationality** (4.6) and **Location** (4.4). Ratings for **Facilities** (4.208), **Professors** (4.2), and **Value** (4.28) are also solid. Areas with slightly lower scores include **Accomodation** (4.083) and **Student Life** (3.84).
This institution excels in its accommodation facilities, receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities, location, and value for money, all scoring a low 1. Professors, student life, and internationality received moderate ratings of 2, indicating these aspects are neither a strong suit nor a major weakness.
~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.
Approximately 77% of reviews are positive, highlighting engaging courses, helpful professors, and a good international community. A small percentage mention a lack of structured support and occasional issues with specific departments.
University of Szeged receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~84% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the diverse faculties, excellent library, and strong support for international students. There are no 1-2 star reviews.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising teachers, learning, and campus life. A small portion of negative feedback (around 6.5%) mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
Nothing to show
Nearly all reviews are positive (~92%), with students highlighting helpful professors, a strong community, and practical learning opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~0%) was negative.
This university has received one review, which is negative. The student rated it 1 out of 5 stars, citing unprofessionalism, poor program management, and English language difficulties among some professors.
Nothing to show
The university offers a strong academic foundation with well-structured courses and a wide range of modules to choose from. I appreciated the flexibility of the programme, which allowed me to explore my interests while still gaining core knowledge in my field. Lecturers were approachable and genuinely invested in students’ growth, and the academic support available was excellent. However, I found that some courses were a bit too theoretical and would have benefited from more hands-on or industry-relevant components. Despite that, the overall environment encouraged self-discipline, curiosity, and collaboration. I would recommend this university to students who are self-motivated and eager to take ownership of their learning journey.
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Nothing to show
My experience has been very positive. I particularly appreciate the supportive professors, diverse international student community, and the opportunities to develop both academically and personally. It offers a welcoming environment, and I would definitely recommend it to students looking for a quality and international study experience.
Nothing to show
