Central European University - CEU vs Corvinus University of Budapest - BCE vs Óbuda University - OE vs Budapest Metropolitan University vs Kodolányi János University - KJU

Side-by-side comparison from 36 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Corvinus University of Budapest - BCE (4.30)
Central European University - CEU: wins 1/7 categories
Corvinus University of Budapest - BCE: wins 5/7 categories
Óbuda University - OE: wins 1/7 categories
Budapest Metropolitan University: wins 0/7 categories
Kodolányi János University - KJU: wins 0/7 categories
Edutus University: wins 0/7 categories
Avicenna International College: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Philosophy
Best programme: Communication Studies
Best programme: Architecture and Urbanism
Best programme: Animation
Budapest, Hungary
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.56
4.50
Win
3.20
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.44
4.67
Win
3.80
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.22
4.25
Win
3.80
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.78
Win
4.56
3.80
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.50
Win
3.20
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.78
4.38
Win
3.40
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.75
4.06
4.20
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse student body and international perspective
  • +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
  • +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
  • +Strong economics and business programs
  • +Supportive and expert faculty and staff
  • +International atmosphere and location
  • +Practical and industry-relevant education
  • +Supportive and helpful professors
  • +Diverse international student body
  • +Unique, broad, and exploratory learning approach
  • +Modern, open-minded environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
  • -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently cited.
  • -There is a general dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor condition of buildings were a major concern.
  • -Lack of organized support for international students was evident.
  • -Lack of practical skills and real-world application in the curriculum.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.

The university demonstrates excellent performance in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks. Facilities and student life are also rated highly. While accommodations are generally positive, they represent the lowest-rated aspect of the university experience. Overall, the institution presents a strong offering with particularly notable strengths in its physical environment and student engagement.

Offering a mixed but generally positive assessment, this institution excels in **Accomodation**, receiving a high score of 4.2. Other strengths include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all rated at 3.8. The university's **Facilities** and **Student Life** are its weakest points, both scoring 3.2, while **Value** sits at a moderate 3.4.

This university presents a generally positive but mixed picture. Its strongest areas include Internationality, scoring a solid 4. Professors also received a commendable rating of 3.67. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation are its weakest points, both averaging a 3. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated moderately at 3.33.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.

With an average rating of 4.28/5 from 18 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong Economics and Business programs, international atmosphere, and a strategic campus location. No negative reviews were recorded.

With 3 out of 5 reviews being positive, students generally find the university offers practical training and helpful professors. Around 20% of feedback noted issues with course availability or administrative support.

With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is mixed. Approximately 33% of reviews are negative, citing a lack of technical skills and real-world experience. Positive comments highlight the university's unique, modern, and open-minded approach.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
30%
39%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
40%
50%
40%
33%
0%
0%
0%
3★
10%
11%
20%
33%
0%
0%
0%
2★
10%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
1★
10%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Excellent International Opportunity

Previously studying in the USA, moving to Budapest was a complete culture shock. However, this university offers a vigorous program with ample opportunities for students who want a career in diplomacy and foreign affairs. I feel constantly challenged and surrounded by bright-minded thinkers. Throwing myself into a new country, new culture, and new language has allowed me to truly be immersed in this field of study. While the program is in English, there are ample opportunities for additional foreign language classes. The fact that this university offers scholarships and the base price of tuition is already so low, is an added bonus.

Erasmus in Banky Donat faculty

I was an Erasmus Student at this University(Banky faculty) in spring semester 19/20. It was the worst Erasmus ever. Only 4/9 subjects which I choose in my Learning Agreement existed in the Neptun system( which is compulsory for every student). So I had only 8/30 ECTS in the first week. Firstly, the coordinators answered my e-mails, but it wasn’t so useful, because they only said: “everything is good don’t mind we will fix it”. (If you try to choose another subject from the “subjects list for Erasmus student” (which is on official page) be ready, that 85% of subjects don’t exist in Neptun or don’t have any places for you. ) After 10000 e-mails with asking for help, they stopped responding to me. It was already the end of the second week of studying when I realize that nothing will change and I couldn’t reach the necessary 30ECTS. I had to return to my home Uni not to miss this semester. I don’t know who is responsible for this situation and I don’t wish anyone to be in my place. So... if you want to spoil your Erasmus, waste money, time and Nerves then go to Obuda University.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close