Moscow State University of Printing Arts - MGUP vs National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO vs Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS vs Moscow Technical University of Communications and Informatics - MTUCI

Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Moscow State University of Printing Arts - MGUP: wins 0/0 categories
National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE: wins 0/0 categories
Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO: wins 0/0 categories
Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS: wins 0/0 categories
Moscow Technical University of Communications and Informatics - MTUCI: wins 0/0 categories
Elbrus Coding Bootcamp: wins 0/0 categories
Center for Creative Leadership: wins 0/0 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology of Human Resources Development
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
4.14
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Location
5.00
4.67
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
5.00
4.33
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
5.00
4.18
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
5.00
4.10
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Value
5.00
4.48
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
5.00
3.99
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging classes with practical application
  • +Exceptional professors encouraging discussion and offering support
  • +Rewarding academic challenges
  • +High academic quality & skilled faculty
  • +Global outlook & diverse programs
  • +Career opportunities & strong network
  • +Engaging, relevant instruction from passionate, supportive faculty.
  • +Emphasis on analytical thinking and practical application of concepts.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Student-centered support and inclusivity
  • +Welcoming and understanding community
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues create an unwelcoming atmosphere.
  • -Insufficient space and outdated facilities detract from the learning environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
  • -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content can be irrelevant or not up-to-date.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Rating summary
What students say

Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in every evaluated aspect. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5. With such uniformly excellent feedback, identifying a weakest area is not possible; the university excels across the entire spectrum of student experience.

This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.

This institution achieves perfect scores across all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a stellar 5 out of 5. This indicates an exceptionally strong and well-rounded university experience with no discernible weak points based on this rating system.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3/5 average rating, reviews highlight engaging classes and helpful professors (~33% positive). However, some negative feedback points to issues with budget allocation and library facilities (~33% negative).

Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting engaging coursework, interactive instructors, and supportive guidance. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
65%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
0%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
33%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
The history of my studies at the MUP im. Ivan Fedorov

Entering this educational institution into the correspondence form of training with the use of distance educational technologies (DOT), I expected a lot of interesting lectures, seminars and skype conferences with teachers. However, the reality of me admitted a lot of surprise. Video-lectures turned out to be very small, Skype conferences were not in sight. Instead of exams and preparation for them, intermediate tests for 10-15-20-25 questions are used, which after the n-th passage begin to be repeated, the exam in total consists of 40-45 assignments.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close