Moscow State University of Printing Arts - MGUP vs National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Russian State Social University - RSSU vs Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia - RUDN vs Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology - Skoltech

Side-by-side comparison from 40 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Moscow State University of Printing Arts - MGUP: wins 4/4 categories
National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE: wins 0/4 categories
Russian State Social University - RSSU: wins 0/4 categories
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia - RUDN: wins 0/4 categories
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology - Skoltech: wins 0/4 categories
Sechenov University: wins 0/4 categories
Moscow State Institute of Culture: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: BA Political Science
Best programme: Hospital and Healthcare Management
Best programme: Professional Musicianship - Vocals
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
4.14
Not rated
3.83
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Location
5.00
Win
4.67
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Professors
5.00
4.33
Not rated
3.83
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Internationality
5.00
4.18
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Student life
5.00
Win
4.10
Not rated
4.60
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Value
5.00
Win
4.48
Not rated
4.17
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Accommodation
5.00
3.99
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging classes with practical application
  • +Exceptional professors encouraging discussion and offering support
  • +Rewarding academic challenges
  • +High academic quality & skilled faculty
  • +Global outlook & diverse programs
  • +Career opportunities & strong network
  • +High-quality, profound knowledge from competent teachers.
  • +Friendly, calm, and supportive learning atmosphere.
  • +High academic standards and rigorous disciplines.
  • +Engaging academics, practical skill development, and career support
  • +Vibrant, multicultural atmosphere with global connections and cultural exchange
  • +Diverse program options and research opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +strong academic structure and dedicated professors
  • +personal and professional growth opportunities
  • +respected and transformative academic environment
  • +Inspiring and dream-fulfilling education
  • +Excellent professors
  • +Suitable for diverse student backgrounds
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues create an unwelcoming atmosphere.
  • -Insufficient space and outdated facilities detract from the learning environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
  • -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including allegations of corruption and biased treatment.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Communication and transparency from the institution are lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of responsiveness and poor communication are significant problems.
Rating summary
What students say

Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in every evaluated aspect. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5. With such uniformly excellent feedback, identifying a weakest area is not possible; the university excels across the entire spectrum of student experience.

This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.

Presenting a uniform performance across all assessed aspects, this institution received identical ratings in each category. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas identified. The university demonstrates a consistent, albeit unexceptional, standing in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, with no single area outperforming others.

This institution demonstrates a robust student life, scoring a 4.5, and excellent internationality and location at 4.2. However, accommodation presents the lowest score at 3.2, with facilities and professors also receiving moderate ratings of 3.8. Value is rated a solid 4.0, suggesting a generally positive experience balanced by some areas for improvement.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **accommodations** and **professor quality**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, **location** and **student life** represent areas for potential improvement, scoring a moderate 3. The university also fares well in **facilities** and **internationality** with solid 4s. Overall, its **value** is rated at a respectable 3.

This institution garners excellent scores in key areas such as **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect marks. **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** also stand out with strong ratings. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Value** present as the weakest points, with average scores. Overall, the university demonstrates a robust academic and social environment, though improvements could be considered in its physical resources and perceived affordability.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3/5 average rating, reviews highlight engaging classes and helpful professors (~33% positive). However, some negative feedback points to issues with budget allocation and library facilities (~33% negative).

Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.

All reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight high academic standards, profound knowledge acquisition, and a friendly, calm atmosphere. They praise teachers as knowledgeable and supportive, recommending the university for quality higher education.

With a 4/5 average rating from 8 reviews, ~75% are positive. Students praise academic exploration, diverse cultures, and career preparation. A small portion (~12.5%) mention administrative delays and corruption allegations.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highly commend the university's strong academic structure and dedicated, knowledgeable professors.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is highly praised. The single review highlighted professors as great, helpful, and experienced, fulfilling a dream to study music.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
65%
100%
56%
0%
100%
100%
4★
0%
22%
0%
22%
0%
0%
0%
3★
33%
9%
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
33%
0%
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
The history of my studies at the MUP im. Ivan Fedorov

Entering this educational institution into the correspondence form of training with the use of distance educational technologies (DOT), I expected a lot of interesting lectures, seminars and skype conferences with teachers. However, the reality of me admitted a lot of surprise. Video-lectures turned out to be very small, Skype conferences were not in sight. Instead of exams and preparation for them, intermediate tests for 10-15-20-25 questions are used, which after the n-th passage begin to be repeated, the exam in total consists of 40-45 assignments.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

RUDN provides a vibrant, multicultural atmosphere ideal for students seeking global connections. However, administrative processes (visa support, registration) can be slow and bureaucratic. The language programs ( Russian/English-taught courses) are excellent for non-native speakers. Campus facilities like libraries and dormitories are decent, though some buildings need renovation. Student clubs and events foster cultural exchange.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close