Humboldt University - HUB vs ESCP Business School vs SRH University of Applied Sciences vs IU International University of Applied Sciences vs Touro University Berlin
Side-by-side comparison from 245 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inspiring professors and high academic standards
- +Practical experience and societal engagement opportunities
- +Relevant and critical curriculum development
- +European campuses and multicultural environment
- +Strong career preparation and top company recruitment
- +Development of interpersonal and managerial skills
- +Practical, hands-on learning with modern equipment.
- +Supportive professors and small, international classes fostering discussion.
- +Strong academic programs and good company connections.
- +Flexible online study for work-life balance
- +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access
- +Relevant, high-quality educational content
- +Small class sizes and accessible professors
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Value and career-focused programs
- +Interactive and personalized learning with engaged professors
- +Diverse and international community fostering personal growth
- +Small class sizes for close student-professor relationships
- +Hands-on learning and practical experience
- +Access to professional gear and facilities
- +Supportive and collaborative environment
- -Disliked curriculum and staff attitude.
- -Facilities were outdated.
- -Unsuitable for specific degree programs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor campus infrastructure are a recurring problem.
- -The curriculum often lacks practical application and relevance.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are prevalent.
- -The financial office is perceived as rude and money-hungry.
- -Slow and unresponsive administrative processes, including grade processing and student support.
- -Poor staff attitude and lack of accountability for errors in student records and applications.
- -Inadequate support and guidance for online students.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are significant drawbacks.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of engagement and relevance in coursework is a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a major concern.
This university garners exceptional marks for its Location and Value, both scoring 4.6. Professors and Internationality also stand out with a strong 4.4. Conversely, Accomodation presents the lowest score at 3. Facilities and Student Life fall in the mid-range with ratings of 3.69 and 3.56 respectively, suggesting areas for potential improvement.
Across various aspects, this institution shows considerable strengths, particularly in **Internationality**, earning a near-perfect score. **Location** and **Value** also received very high marks. Student life and professors are rated positively, as are facilities. However, the lowest-rated category is **Accomodation**, indicating an area for potential improvement.
With a well-rounded performance, this university shines brightest in **Internationality** and **Professors**, both receiving scores above 4. Student life and value also present strong points. Conversely, **Accommodations** are the weakest area, scoring 3.25, while facilities also received a moderately lower rating.
This institution garners notable praise in several key areas, with **Internationality** and **Professors** receiving particularly high scores. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a more moderate range of positive feedback.
This institution garners strong approval, particularly in its Location and Internationality, both scoring an impressive 4.86. Professors and Student Life also receive high marks, averaging 4.57. While Facilities are well-regarded at 4.67 and Value is a solid 4.57, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a rating of 3.83.
This university garners strong praise, particularly for its **Professors** (4.89) and **Location** (4.81). **Student Life** (4.57), **Internationality** (4.55), and **Value** (4.55) also receive favorable scores. **Facilities** (4.43) and **Accommodation** (4.29) are rated well, though they represent the lowest scores in this assessment.
This institution achieves outstanding scores in several key areas, notably Internationality (5.0) and Facilities and Student Life, both at an impressive 4.75. However, Accomodation presents a significant challenge, receiving the lowest rating at 2.25. Professors and Value also received solid, above-average scores.
~78% of reviews are positive, highlighting enlightening academics, beautiful campuses, and engaging learning. A small percentage (~5.6%) mentions a less-than-ideal curriculum or staff attitude.
Approximately 97.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting rewarding experiences, multicultural environments, and personal/professional growth. A single negative review mentioned the EMIB program should be updated.
~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning, international environment, and supportive professors. Negative feedback (~9.5%) mentions unorganized administration and issues with professor responsiveness.
~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, modern platforms, and accessible materials. A small percentage (~5%) mention issues with grading delays and slow administrative support.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.57/5. Students highlight a strong international environment, small class sizes, and supportive faculty, contributing to a positive academic and cultural experience.
All 29 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.66/5. Students praise the interactive learning, international community, and supportive professors. They highlight academic and personal growth in a motivating environment.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~88% of feedback being 4-5 stars. Students praise hands-on learning, creative freedom, and access to professional-grade equipment. There is virtually no negative feedback.
My experience at Humboldt has been more than great so far. University is free in Germany, and the student facilities are amazing. The canteen food is good and cheap, the public transport is much cheaper as a student, the accomodation too (but there is a long waiting list!). My master is in English and I am super happy with the opportunities, the professors, and the general academic environment__
To me, studying at ESCP has been a really rewarding experience. The multicultural environment helped me grow both personally and professionally. Professors are very supportive and bring real-world insights into the classroom. I rlly liked the flexibility to study in different campuses across Europe. Although some admin processes can be slow, but overall I felt well-prepared for the job market.
Professors are supportive,and also guides students to better understanding of the concepts. But most of the time they are helping. There is also Case-Studies that helps us get better insights of real life cases.
My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.
Nothing to show
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
I'm a Creative Audio Production & Sound Engineering graduate. My experience at Catalyst was generally positive. It had a culture of friendliness, kindness and helpfulness from the staff, professors and students. The classes are not the typical classes but are more so akin to workshops. You get introduced to a subject, technique or idea and you are very quickly thrown in the deep end to get your hands dirty in experimentation and practice, which I prefer. You get access to studios and a lot of fancy audio gear. One downside I experienced is the limited studio time. I loved working in the big studios but they increasingly over the years kept getting harder to book due to limited availability. What I found to be the most impactful experience was how challenging the projects were. There were no exams, fun fact. Instead of exams, we had big projects that spanned the entirety of each semester with hard milestone deadlines in between. Since these projects span the whole semester, you can begin to imagine the scale of work involved in completing them. The challenge in handling all the projects pushed me to achieve more than I could have imagined. I needed an environment like that. In conclusion, my time at Catalyst was great. Through all the hard work my skills increased exponentially in a short period of time. The staff and teachers are amazing and always ready to help.
