Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU vs National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University - ULSPU vs Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO vs Ulyanovsk State University - UlSU

Side-by-side comparison from 38 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU: wins 0/2 categories
National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE: wins 0/2 categories
Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University - ULSPU: wins 0/2 categories
Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO: wins 2/2 categories
Ulyanovsk State University - UlSU: wins 0/2 categories
Elbrus Coding Bootcamp: wins 0/2 categories
Center for Creative Leadership: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Mathematics
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology of Human Resources Development
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
4.14
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.00
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.00
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.50
4.19
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.75
4.10
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Value
4.25
4.48
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical skills and real-world experience
  • +Supportive environment and positive social life
  • +Quality teaching and engaging subjects
  • +High academic quality & skilled faculty
  • +Global outlook & diverse programs
  • +Career opportunities & strong network
  • +High-quality education and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong student support and career assistance
  • +Active campus life and creative opportunities
  • +Engaging, relevant instruction from passionate, supportive faculty.
  • +Emphasis on analytical thinking and practical application of concepts.
  • +Diverse academic programs and faculties
  • +Extensive facilities and resources
  • +Strong international connections and collaborations

Nothing to show

  • +Student-centered support and inclusivity
  • +Welcoming and understanding community
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
  • -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities & equipment
  • -Inconsistent and uninspiring teaching quality
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content can be irrelevant or not up-to-date.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
  • -Inconsistent or poor quality teaching across departments frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause unnecessary stress and inefficiency.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals exceptional strengths, particularly in **Student Life** (4.75) and **Internationality** (4.5). Facilities and value also received positive scores. Conversely, **Location** (3.95) and **Accomodation** (3.925) represent areas with room for improvement, though professors garnered a respectable 4.1 rating.

This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.

A consistent rating of zero across all surveyed categories presents a peculiar academic profile. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or identifiable weaknesses to highlight. The university performs uniformly poorly in every aspect, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, according to the provided metrics.

This institution achieves perfect scores across all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a stellar 5 out of 5. This indicates an exceptionally strong and well-rounded university experience with no discernible weak points based on this rating system.

Presenting a concerning picture, this university received zero ratings in all surveyed categories: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. Consequently, there are no apparent strengths or weaknesses to highlight, as the institution scored identically across every aspect of its operation.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting theoretical and soft skill development, good faculty, and enjoyable extracurriculars. There are no negative reviews.

Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.

All four reviews are positive, giving an average of 4.5/5 stars. Students praise the quality of education and professors, while also mentioning good employment support and developed public activities.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting engaging coursework, interactive instructors, and supportive guidance. No negative feedback was received.

With a single review, this university receives a perfect 5/5 rating, indicating overwhelmingly positive sentiment. The feedback highlights strong academic programs across many faculties and extensive facilities.

Nothing to show

With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
65%
50%
100%
100%
0%
100%
4★
50%
22%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
13%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close