University of Hamburg - UHH vs Brand Academy – University of Applied Sciences vs Hamburg University of Applied Sciences vs Kühne Logistics University - KLU vs Hochschule Fresenius
Side-by-side comparison from 60 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse and international campus life fostering global connections.
- +High-quality education with a focus on research and personal development.
- +Supportive academic environment with helpful staff and extracurricular activities.
- +Quality teaching and environment
- +Strong academic and career focus
- +Dedicated professors and engaging sustainability focus
- +Positive campus atmosphere and events
- +Supportive faculty and student engagement
- +Supportive people and approachable professors
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Strong networking and international community
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
Nothing to show
- +Strong technology, entrepreneurship, and innovation focus
- +Small classes and personal lecturer/staff experience
- +Excellent value for money and career/life start opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
- -Disorganized administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Lack of support and engaging teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient support services are common complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Administrative issues, including poor communication and disorganized processes, are a major source of frustration.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in the curriculum disappoints students.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and course organization leads to confusion.
Performance in university ratings reveals strengths and areas for improvement. Location and professors are particularly well-regarded, boasting the highest scores. Student life, internationality, and value also received positive marks. Accommodation appears to be the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating, while facilities present a moderate score.
This institution garners a perfect score of 5 across all assessed categories. Its strengths are exceptionally broad, encompassing facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings. The university presents a uniformly excellent picture for prospective students.
This institution excels in several key areas, with professors and student life receiving particularly strong scores. Internationality and value also stand out as notable strengths. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest aspect of the university's offerings. Facilities and location are rated moderately, falling between the strongest and weakest points.
Examining the provided ratings reveals a university excelling in several key aspects. Its location stands out with an impressive score of 4.89, closely followed by strong performance in internationality (4.8), facilities (4.6), student life (4.6), and professors (4.65). However, accommodation presents a clear area for improvement, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, while value remains solid at 4.55.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, earning perfect scores for Professors and Accomodation, and near-perfect ratings for Facilities and Student Life. Its strongest aspects clearly lie in the academic and living experiences offered. Conversely, the university's Internationality and Value for money received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories, indicating areas where there is room for improvement.
With 21 out of 23 reviews being positive (approximately 91%), students praise campus life, global connections, and educational quality, highlighting a focus on research and personality development. The university is also commended for student support services and extracurricular activities.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback with a 5/5 average rating. The sole review highlights excellent teaching and a supportive environment, contributing to a ~100% positive sentiment.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students praise dedicated professors and impactful sustainability initiatives. Some suggest improvements to dining facilities and lecture duration.
With an average rating of 4.76/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight supportive professors, a personal learning environment with small classes, and practical, real-world experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
Nothing to show
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship, small class sizes, and a positive learning experience. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience at KLU has truly been life-changing. This university has given me a second chance and opened the door to a completely new life filled with opportunities. From the very beginning, it has felt like a second home. What makes KLU so special is the people. Every single person here is supportive and genuinely willing to help. The professors are not only highly qualified and professional, but also approachable and always ready to guide you in any academic or professional matter. I have never been in a place like this before. The strong connection with industry, the quality of events, and the incredible network of classmates and alumni create the perfect environment for both personal and professional growth. I will always be grateful to KLU for everything I have experienced here.
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
Excellent small school with a strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship; small classes; personal experience with lecturers and staff; well-designed curriculum; good lectures and interesting guest lecturers; a lot of traveling if you don't live in Hamburg's south, but manageable for three semesters; excellent value for money compared to UK/US schools, even without receiving one of the many scholarships; financial breakeven in less than two years; well-known in northern Germany, but now more so in central Europe; each class has one or two larger successful startups, with founders frequently giving lectures on campus; the alumni network feels more like a family than a pure "business network"; the new CEO is driving growth; and there are plenty of opportunities and support provided for extracurricular activities, initiatives, etc.
