SKEMA Business School vs Arizona State University - ASU vs The College of Wooster vs Schiller International University vs Lambda School
Side-by-side comparison from 339 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programmes with practical application
- +Excellent opportunities for skill development and networking
- +Valuable international exposure and alumni support
- +Critical thinking and personal growth
- +Supportive instructors and diverse community
- +Practical experience and career preparation
- +Supportive faculty and engaging academic programs
- +Strong sense of community and diverse student body
- +Excellent resources and opportunities for growth
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
Nothing to show
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable professors
- +Small class sizes and personal learning environment
- +Diverse educational opportunities and resources
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and disorganization.
- -Teaching faculty and their perceived focus on profit over education are criticized.
- -Guidance for career goals and clarity on doubts are lacking.
- -Insufficient support for online students and inflexible course structures.
- -Poor quality of instruction and unhelpful TAs.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary frustration.
- -Poor communication and lack of student support are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors** (4.41), **Internationality** (4.36), and **Location** (4.25). **Facilities** (4.21) and **Student Life** (4.11) also receive favorable scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 3.58, while **Value** sits at 4.04.
This university garners strong evaluations across several key areas. Professors receive the highest marks, indicating a significant strength in teaching quality. The weakest area is student life, though it still maintains a positive rating. Other aspects such as facilities, location, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated comparably well, suggesting a generally positive student experience.
Academia shines with professors receiving a stellar 4.43 rating, indicating a significant strength. Accommodations and internationality also score well, both above 4. The university's weakest areas, though still respectable, are location (3.71) and facilities (3.86). Value and student life round out the assessments with solid marks.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
Nothing to show
This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across multiple aspects. Its facilities, professors, and location are exceptionally strong, all scoring very similarly high. Student life and accommodation also fare well. The primary area for improvement is internationality, which is rated significantly lower than other categories. Value for money is also rated quite positively, though not at the highest tier.
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
Over 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting student associations, international opportunities, and practical skills for careers. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and course organization.
With ~99% positive sentiment, reviews highlight critical thinking, diverse programs, and supportive instructors. A small ~1% of feedback mentions issues with online course structure and TA helpfulness.
Students praise the college for its supportive community, excellent faculty, and engaging academic programs. The serene environment and research opportunities are frequently highlighted. Negative feedback is minimal.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
Nothing to show
All 14 reviews are positive, averaging 4.79/5. Students praise the university's diverse programs, excellent professors, and supportive environment, highlighting small class sizes and mentorship. No negative feedback was provided.
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I like how comprehensive and well-rounded all of the knowledge I have so far learned during my studies has been. However, some instructors refuse to modernize their curricula and continue to teach in their antiquated ways.
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
