SKEMA Business School vs New York University - NYU vs Arizona State University - ASU vs Schiller International University vs Center for Creative Leadership
Side-by-side comparison from 474 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
- +Strong academic programs and accomplished faculty
- +Excellent career prospects and networking opportunities
- +Supportive and inclusive community environment
- +Engaging community and supportive people
- +Critical thinking development and personal growth
- +Practical learning experiences and helpful advisors
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Student-centered support and inclusivity
- +Welcoming and understanding community
- +Small class sizes and strong community support.
- +High quality education and engaging professors.
- +Beautiful campus and excellent food options.
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
- -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
- -Lack of learning and value for money
- -Significant student debt
- -Lack of support and consideration for online students, particularly those with work or family commitments.
- -Poor quality of instruction and unhelpful teaching assistants.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
- -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of instructor support and engagement is a common complaint.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.
This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance with particularly high marks for its professors. Facilities also received a very favorable rating. Conversely, student life and accommodation represent the areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores. Internationality and value for money are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded university experience.
This institution performs exceptionally well in academics, with Professors earning the highest rating at 4.65. Facilities and Location also receive strong marks around 4.4. Student Life, while still positive, is the lowest-rated category at 4.28, indicating a potential area for improvement in extracurricular engagement and campus atmosphere.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.
This institution achieves an excellent score for its professors, a perfect 5 out of 5. Student life and location are also highly praised, both receiving 4.67. Facilities and internationality are rated strongly at 4.33, mirroring the value proposition. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which sits at 3.67.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 123 reviews, nearly all feedback is positive (~99%). Students praise academic rigor, accessible faculty, and diverse community. One negative review expressed regret over student debt.
With an average rating of 4.47/5 from 167 reviews, approximately 98.8% are positive, highlighting rewarding academic experiences, community, and facilities. A small fraction of feedback noted issues with online course structure and TA helpfulness.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with a high average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise small class sizes, strong community, excellent professors, beautiful campus, and quality education. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
I like how comprehensive and well-rounded all of the knowledge I have so far learned during my studies has been. However, some instructors refuse to modernize their curricula and continue to teach in their antiquated ways.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
