SKEMA Business School vs New York University - NYU vs Drew University vs Schiller International University vs Data Science Dojo
Side-by-side comparison from 290 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +strong international exposure & opportunities
- +practical and relevant program curriculum & skills
- +valuable alumni network & career support
- +Dedicated professors and academic rigor
- +Supportive environment for integration and collaboration
- +Vibrant student life and modern facilities
- +Accessible and helpful professors and staff
- +Strong sense of community and personal attention
- +Good classes, resources, and environment
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
Nothing to show
- +Affordable, flexible, and self-paced online learning
- +Practical, real-world skills for career advancement
- +Supportive community and accessible advisors
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare, with concerns about teaching quality and discrimination.
- -Ineffective career guidance and support for students.
- -Poor educational outcomes and value for money.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Lack of adequate support and resources
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
Nothing to show
- -Policy changes after enrollment frustrate students.
- -Course progression and pacing did not meet advertised expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors and internationality stand out as particularly strong aspects, receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. However, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Value for money is also a solid, though not exceptional, performer in this rating overview.
Generally speaking, this university garners solid ratings across multiple facets. Professors and Facilities stand out as the strongest areas, both scoring above 4.3. Student Life and Accommodations represent areas for potential improvement, with ratings around 4.1. Location, Internationality, and Value also receive favorable marks, generally within the 4.2-4.3 range.
This institution's strengths lie in its outstanding **Location** and impressive **Internationality**, both scoring a high 4.33. **Professors** and **Student Life** also received positive marks at 4.0. Conversely, **Accomodation** is rated at 3.33, and **Value** is the lowest at 3.0, indicating these areas could benefit from improvement. **Facilities** are rated moderately at 3.67.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
Nothing to show
Exceptional strengths are evident in the university's professors, location, and student life, all receiving ratings above 4.66. Facilities and internationality are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations present the weakest area, with a score of 3.55, while value sits slightly higher at 4.55.
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and helpful alumni networks. A small percentage (around 3%) cite issues with management, communication, and organization.
With an average rating of 4.28/5 from 121 reviews, ~99% are positive. Students praise academic excellence, supportive professors, and a collaborative environment. Minimal negative feedback exists.
With an average rating of 4/5 stars, university student feedback is largely positive, highlighting good classes, helpful professors, and a positive environment. About a third of reviews expressed concerns regarding censorship and a lack of support for student activism.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
Nothing to show
With a 4.61 average rating from 18 reviews, ~89% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise flexibility, affordability, and practical skills, though ~6% mention policy changes causing disappointment.
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
Nothing to show
My experience with Nexford was nothing short of amazing! The curriculum was exactly what it should be, and I got real value for my money. I learned so much—things I never even knew existed, yet they turned out to be the key to success for me and many other students I know . It was a truly eye-opening journey that made me realize how little I actually knew before Nexford. I’ve been through a traditional university, graduated with distinction, yet when I compare my learning experiences, I can honestly say I didn’t learn much back then. It was after Nexford that my confidence truly grew. Now, when I speak, people acknowledge the depth of my knowledge and intelligence. Nexford doesn’t just teach you; it pushes you to grow. One of the best parts is when you finally start understanding project requirements, quizzes, and community discussions. It’s a whole new level of learning that builds your leadership skills and teaches you how to win—because at the end of the day, success depends on you. Nexford is a game-changer! This is my honest review, straight from the heart.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
