SKEMA Business School vs ESSCA School of Management vs Nanjing University - NJU vs Nanjing University of Finance and Economics vs Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 192 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Hohai University (4.70)
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/4 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/4 categories
Nanjing University - NJU: wins 0/4 categories
Nanjing University of Finance and Economics: wins 0/4 categories
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology: wins 0/4 categories
Hohai University: wins 0/4 categories
Nanjing University of Science and Technology - NJUST: wins 4/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Nanjing, China
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Electromechanical Engineering and Building Automation
Category ratings
Facilities
4.23
3.77
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Location
4.24
4.21
3.57
Not rated
4.00
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.39
3.88
3.14
Not rated
3.00
4.67
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.39
3.92
3.00
Not rated
5.00
4.67
5.00
Student life
4.14
4.16
3.14
Not rated
3.00
4.67
5.00
Win
Value
4.05
3.73
3.43
Not rated
2.00
4.67
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.59
3.42
3.43
Not rated
4.00
4.67
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs with practical, career-focused learning
  • +Diverse, international student environment and collaborative experiences
  • +Excellent professional opportunities and supportive career services
  • +Quality education and specialized pathways
  • +Vibrant campus life and student activities
  • +Practical experience and professional connections
  • +Excellent campus facilities and environment.
  • +High teaching quality and strong academic reputation.
  • +Diverse community and quality student accommodation.

Nothing to show

  • +Accessible and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging and practical curriculum
  • +Strong career services and networking opportunities
  • +Comfortable campus, good facilities, flexible curriculum
  • +Skilled and experienced lecturers
  • +Diverse programs and international community
  • +Pleasant campus environment and events
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and exam/result mismanagement.
  • -Faculty and teaching quality are criticized for prioritizing profit over education and lacking effective guidance.
  • -Program disorganization and overwhelming course load create difficulty in tracking deadlines and managing studies.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unhelpful professors
  • -Disorganized administration and irrelevant course content
  • -High cost for unengaging and outdated programs
  • -Lack of action regarding animal abuse by students.
  • -Ethical concerns about the institution's values.

Nothing to show

  • -Difficulty with instruction in Chinese
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Administrative issues and lack of effective management create frustration.
  • -Communication problems and unresponsiveness from staff are a recurring issue.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Students find outdated facilities frustrating.
  • -Students are unhappy with a lack of resources and support.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners commendable ratings across most aspects. Professors and internationality stand out as the strongest areas, both receiving an impressive 4.39. Location and facilities also score highly, around 4.24 and 4.23 respectively. Student life and value are rated favorably at 4.14 and 4.05. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which received a comparatively lower rating of 3.59.

Assessing the university's performance reveals distinct strengths and areas for improvement. The location stands out with the highest rating, closely followed by student life. Accommodation, however, presents the lowest score, indicating a potential area requiring attention. Other metrics, including facilities, professors, internationality, and value, fall within a mid-range, demonstrating a generally solid but not exceptional performance.

The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest area. The **facilities** and **accommodation** also receive favorable ratings. Conversely, **internationality** is the lowest-rated aspect, with **professors** and **student life** receiving moderately lower scores than the university's stronger points. The **value** proposition is also rated well.

Nothing to show

This institution excels significantly in its internationality, receiving a perfect score. Accommodation and location are also strong points, both earning four out of five. Conversely, the university's facilities are its weakest area, rated at a zero. Value for money is also a concern, with a score of two. Professor quality and student life are mid-range, each scoring three.

The university demonstrates exceptionally strong performance in several key areas. Facilities and location both received a perfect score of 5. Other aspects such as Professors, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also highly rated, averaging approximately 4.67. This indicates a well-rounded positive experience for students.

Exceptional marks were awarded across all surveyed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received perfect scores of five. This indicates a uniformly outstanding university experience where no single area significantly outshines others, nor are there any weaker points to note based on these ratings.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.35/5 average rating from 156 reviews, ~87% praised diverse subjects, practical skills, international diversity, and career support. A small minority (~2.6%) cited poor management, communication, and disorganization.

Most reviews are positive (~74%), highlighting good knowledge transfer, specialization options, practical experience, and a vibrant campus life. A small portion of negative feedback (~8%) mentions unprepared professors and organizational issues.

With a 3.29 average rating, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good facilities, teaching quality, and campus reputation. Negative feedback (~28.6%) expresses concern regarding animal welfare.

Nothing to show

The single review provided is negative, rating the university at 2/5. The primary concern highlighted is the difficulty of Chinese studies, despite positive remarks about the school environment.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise comfortable campuses, complete facilities, flexible curriculum, skilled lecturers, and a conducive environment for learning and self-development, including for international students.

This university receives a highly positive reception, with 100% of feedback being favorable. Students highlight a comfortable campus environment and engaging events like the February Orchid viewing Festival. The average rating is 4 out of 5 stars.

Rating distribution
5★
49%
31%
29%
0%
0%
67%
0%
4★
42%
46%
29%
0%
0%
33%
100%
3★
7%
15%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
4%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
1★
1%
4%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Well-rounded programme

Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.

Allows Animal Torturer to Enroll

As a person who is in higher education, I would never ever enroll in a school that allows and condemns a person, a psychopath, who abuses and torture animals, to enroll and study there. Shame on this school and shame on China. I would recommend to considering going to a school that values life; especially of the vulnerable and voiceless (animals)! Enroll in a school that uses their voice and does something to protect the vulnerable. Skip this school that stays quiet about an animal torturer and allows them to enroll.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Environmental sustainability

Hohai University is a research institution, aimed at solving problems in the environment. It offers varied programs : water and hydrology, environmental science, materials science, computer science, MBA etc. It provides conducive environment for international students.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close