SKEMA Business School vs Mills College vs Schiller International University vs Udacity vs Center for Creative Leadership
Side-by-side comparison from 276 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry relevance and practical skills
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Career opportunities and personal development
Nothing to show
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Engaging and enjoyable learning experience
- +Realistic projects and experienced tutors
- +Personalized and flexible learning options
- +Student-centered support and inclusivity
- +Welcoming and understanding community
- +Welcoming and inclusive community
- +Beautiful and safe campus environment
- +Supportive and helpful faculty and advisors
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
- -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
Nothing to show
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
- -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.
Nothing to show
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
This institution demonstrates a varied performance across key metrics. Its strongest areas are clearly Professors, Accomodation, and Value, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, Facilities and Student Life are identified as areas for improvement, with ratings of 3. The university also scores well in Internationality, indicating a globally engaged environment.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.
A generally positive university rating profile is presented. The strongest areas include Professors, achieving a high score of 4.64, closely followed by Student Life and Facilities, both scoring above 4.38. Accommodations, while still good at 4.09, represent the weakest surveyed category, with Internationality also slightly lower at 4.07.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
All 3 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students found the lessons engaging and realistic, with experienced tutors and practical projects contributing to a positive learning experience.
With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.
Colorado State University receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being highly rated. Students frequently praise the university's beautiful campus, welcoming atmosphere, and strong sense of community. Academic advisors are noted for their exceptional support, significantly contributing to student success.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
I liked how there was a quick questionnaire during onboarding to personalize my experience. In my case, I did the course to see if the subject matter was the right one for me, as I do not have a technical background. I could choose to study around my schedule or to follow a disciplined program, which is what I need sometimes to help with motivation levels. Maybe a short course on its own is not enough to start working in this field, but I enjoyed the process and hope to be able to work on some different projects at my current job in the future, or at the very least, communicate with our dev team a bit better.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
