SKEMA Business School vs St. Mary's University, San Antonio vs Huntington University vs Schiller International University vs Washington State University - WSU
Side-by-side comparison from 226 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
- +Extensive student support
- +Strong marketing and business programmes
- +Inclusive and supportive campus environment
- +Engaging extracurriculars and personal development opportunities
- +High-quality teaching and student well-being support
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Supportive and approachable community
- +Effective and helpful faculty teaching methods
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Academic excellence and holistic development
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Welcoming environment and quality facilities
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
- -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Teaching quality is inconsistent, with some instructors lacking engagement.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -Students frequently cite poor communication and disorganization from staff.
- -A lack of responsiveness and support from faculty is a recurring issue.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodations. Value for money is also a significant strength, with a top rating. However, the university's weakest aspect is its Location, receiving a score of zero. Internationality is another area for improvement, scoring a moderate two.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Value** and **Professors**, receiving the highest marks in these areas. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also score well. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest aspect, with the lowest rating. The remaining categories, including **Location** and **Internationality**, fall within a moderate range, suggesting areas for potential development.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Overall, this institution garners impressive reviews, particularly excelling in its **professors**, who received the highest rating. The **facilities** and **value** also scored very well. The area with the lowest, though still solid, rating was **internationality**. Other aspects like **location**, **student life**, and **accommodation** all contributed to a generally positive evaluation.
Remarkably strong scores define the university's profile. Facilities, professors, and student life all achieved an outstanding 4.75, while location and accommodation also garnered excellent ratings. The sole area for potential improvement lies in internationality, which registered at 3.5. Overall, the institution offers a compelling value proposition, indicated by a solid 4.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With one review received, the average rating is 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights strong student support. No negative reviews were submitted.
All eight reviews are positive, averaging 4.13/5 stars. Students highlight diversity, well-organized extracurriculars, and a supportive learning environment with skilled professors and counselors. No negative feedback was provided.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
Nearly all reviews are positive (~100%), highlighting strong faculty support and approachable students. Students praise effective teaching methods and opportunities for personal and academic growth.
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise academic excellence, faculty passion, and a welcoming, diverse environment. Facilities and resources are also highlighted positively.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
