SKEMA Business School vs Oberlin College vs Columbia University vs Schiller International University vs Davenport University
Side-by-side comparison from 247 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs with practical, career-focused learning
- +Diverse, international student environment and collaborative experiences
- +Excellent professional opportunities and supportive career services
- +Individual attention and engaging courses
- +Strong sense of community and personal growth opportunities
- +Supportive and passionate faculty
- +Diverse and thoughtful food options
- +Affordable and accessible accommodation
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
Nothing to show
- +exceptional, supportive faculty
- +transformative, holistic program approach
- +intellectual rigor and personal growth
- +Experiential learning and practical application of business concepts
- +High-quality instruction and direct industry leader engagement
- +International exposure and strong peer networking opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and exam/result mismanagement.
- -Faculty and teaching quality are criticized for prioritizing profit over education and lacking effective guidance.
- -Program disorganization and overwhelming course load create difficulty in tracking deadlines and managing studies.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of clear communication and support exacerbates problems.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
This university garners commendable ratings across most aspects. Professors and internationality stand out as the strongest areas, both receiving an impressive 4.39. Location and facilities also score highly, around 4.24 and 4.23 respectively. Student life and value are rated favorably at 4.14 and 4.05. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which received a comparatively lower rating of 3.59.
Academic and extracurricular aspects stand out, with professors and student life earning perfect scores. Facilities and accommodation also receive strong marks, indicating good resources and living options. However, the university's location is a notable weakness. Internationality is rated well, suggesting a diverse student body. The overall value proposition lands in the middle, indicating a satisfactory but not exceptional return on investment.
An analysis of the provided ratings reveals a university that excels in several key areas. Facilities stand out with a score of 4.49, closely followed by Internationality and Value, both receiving 4.44. Professors and Location also score highly at 4.37. Student Life is rated well at 4.35. The lowest rated aspect is Accomodation, with a score of 4.22, suggesting this is an area for potential improvement.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, internationality, and value. These strengths suggest a robust academic environment with excellent accessibility and global outlook, all at a high value for students. Conversely, the university's weakest points are its facilities, student life, and accommodation, all of which scored zero. This indicates significant areas for improvement in campus infrastructure, social engagement, and housing provisions.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are also strong, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Professors and Value are rated highly at 4.67. The lowest score, though still solid, is for Internationality at 4.33.
With a 4.35/5 average rating from 156 reviews, ~87% praised diverse subjects, practical skills, international diversity, and career support. A small minority (~2.6%) cited poor management, communication, and disorganization.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. The reviewer appreciated individual attention and interesting classes, finding it a great environment for personal growth. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~99%), with students praising the engaging academics and passionate professors. Some mention food variety and accommodation limitations.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
Nothing to show
With a 5/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The single review praises the transformative PhD program, highlighting exceptional faculty and unique educational approaches. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight hands-on learning, business idea development, and valuable connections with industry leaders and peers as significant benefits. Minimal negative feedback was present.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
