SKEMA Business School vs Rutgers University - RU vs Texas Christian University vs St. Mary's University, San Antonio vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 254 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
- +Outstanding instructors and accessible faculty support
- +Intellectually stimulating curriculum and diverse opportunities
- +Welcoming and supportive campus community
- +Caring professors and supportive student community
- +Friendly campus atmosphere and lifestyle
- +Extensive student support
- +Strong marketing and business programmes
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Academic excellence and holistic development
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Welcoming environment and quality facilities
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
- -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are common complaints.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or uninspiring.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources were frequently mentioned.
- -The quality of teaching and course structure were often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -Students frequently cite poor communication and disorganization from staff.
- -A lack of responsiveness and support from faculty is a recurring issue.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.
Among surveyed categories, the university excels particularly in Student Life and Location, both scoring above 4.5. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest rating at 4.11. Other areas like Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value also received strong ratings, generally falling between 4.28 and 4.43, indicating a well-rounded academic experience.
This institution garners excellent marks, particularly for its outstanding **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving a perfect score. **Student Life** and **Value** also stand out as exceptionally strong areas. While **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are still highly rated at a solid 4, these represent the areas with the most room for improvement compared to the university's top-performing aspects.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodations. Value for money is also a significant strength, with a top rating. However, the university's weakest aspect is its Location, receiving a score of zero. Internationality is another area for improvement, scoring a moderate two.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Remarkably strong scores define the university's profile. Facilities, professors, and student life all achieved an outstanding 4.75, while location and accommodation also garnered excellent ratings. The sole area for potential improvement lies in internationality, which registered at 3.5. Overall, the institution offers a compelling value proposition, indicated by a solid 4.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
~100% of 68 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.32/5. Students highlight excellent education, caring professors, and available faculty.
With a single review, the university is rated 4/5. This positive feedback highlights an amazing campus, professors, and student lifestyle, noting a friendly and educational vibe. Negative feedback is negligible.
With one review received, the average rating is 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights strong student support. No negative reviews were submitted.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise academic excellence, faculty passion, and a welcoming, diverse environment. Facilities and resources are also highlighted positively.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
