SKEMA Business School vs Middlesex University - MDX vs Manipal Academy of Higher Education - MAHE - MU vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Amity University Dubai
Side-by-side comparison from 564 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, skill-building programs with industry relevance
- +Supportive and interactive faculty and staff
- +Rich extracurricular activities and networking opportunities
- +Practical, relevant, and industry-standard course content
- +Passionate, supportive, and approachable lecturers
- +Diverse, inclusive, and vibrant campus community
- +Diverse student body and global community
- +Strong academic programs and industry-relevant knowledge
- +Supportive faculty and excellent placement support
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Holistic development and practical experience
- +Engaging campus life and facilities
- +Helpful and empathetic faculty and staff
- +Good value for cost with high educational standards
- +Welcoming and community-oriented campus environment
- +Experiential learning and practical application of business concepts
- +High-quality instruction and direct industry leader engagement
- +International exposure and strong peer networking opportunities
- -Administrative & management issues, including poor communication and exam/result mismanagement.
- -Concerns about financial focus over student well-being and discrimination.
- -Unorganized programs and overwhelming course loads with varied evaluations.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often criticized as being ineffective.
- -High tuition fees and poor job placement rates are a major concern.
- -Limited and often damaged recreational facilities detract from the student experience.
- -The university offers a poor value for money regarding services provided.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Poor communication, delays, and unprofessional staff lead to a frustrating experience.
- -Lack of practical learning opportunities, such as events and field trips, is a significant drawback.
- -The quality of teaching and faculty experience does not justify the high fees.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are major drawbacks.
- -Poor communication and a lack of student support negatively impact the experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
This university garners strong ratings across several key areas, with **Professors** and **Internationality** standing out as exceptional strengths. Students also appreciate the **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life**. The **Value** offering is also well-regarded. The **Accomodation** category received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement.
Surveyed metrics indicate a generally positive university experience. Professors and Internationality received the highest marks, both above 4.2. Facilities and Student Life also scored well, exceeding 4.1. Location and Value were rated respectably around 4.0. The weakest area, Accommodation, scored significantly lower at 3.6.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in **Student Life**, boasting a high rating. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive favorable scores. Conversely, **Internationality** and **Accomodation** are identified as areas with lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. The university presents a mixed but generally positive outlook across its evaluated components.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
Facilities stand out as the strongest area, earning a high rating. Conversely, Value and Accomodation received the lowest scores among the assessed categories. Student Life and Internationality also performed well, indicating positive student experiences. Professors and Location are rated moderately, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.
This institution garners strong marks, particularly excelling in **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving 4.6 out of 5. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** also score well at 4. The **Accomodation** rating of 3.8 stands out as the lowest, though still respectable, in this comprehensive evaluation. Overall, the university presents a positive image with a particularly robust academic and geographical offering.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are also strong, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Professors and Value are rated highly at 4.67. The lowest score, though still solid, is for Internationality at 4.33.
Around 97.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical skills, career development, and enriching international experiences. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions program disorganization and communication issues.
With a 4.24 average rating from 161 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students praise practical course content, passionate lecturers, and a good campus vibe. No negative reviews were recorded.
With a 4.11/5 average rating from 128 reviews, ~83% praise the university for its diverse student body, supportive environment, and robust academic programs. A small minority (~0.8%) found it expensive with limited recreational facilities and placements.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
With an average rating of 3.8/5, ~74% of 112 reviews are positive, highlighting approachable faculty and growth opportunities. A small ~7% of feedback noted issues like unprofessionalism and communication delays.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.2/5. Students highlight convenient programs, amazing faculty, excellent value, and a positive campus atmosphere. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight hands-on learning, business idea development, and valuable connections with industry leaders and peers as significant benefits. Minimal negative feedback was present.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
most teachers are very patient when helping and explaining to student with questions, the time table planning is not great, responsible team is only accepting online request which the reply was always unable to make changes(except health related issues )
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Amity University's Aerospace Engineering bachelor's program offers a comprehensive blend of theoretical knowledge and practical exposure in the field of aviation and aerospace technology. The curriculum is well-structured, covering essential subjects such as aerodynamics, aircraft propulsion, avionics, and space technology. The faculty members are generally supportive and knowledgeable, although some students have noted variations in teaching quality across different courses. The university's infrastructure includes laboratories and research facilities that facilitate learning and experimentation. On the downside, there have been occasional concerns about administrative processes and campus amenities, which could be improved to enhance overall student experience. Another downside is that the university does not provide any form of placements. Additionally, while the program covers a broad spectrum of topics, some students feel that certain specialized areas could be explored in greater depth. In conclusion, Amity University's Aerospace Engineering program provides a solid foundation for students aspiring to enter the aerospace industry. With its practical approach and decent faculty support. Prospective students should consider visiting the campus and researching recent student feedback to make an informed decision about joining the program.
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
