SKEMA Business School vs Montana State University - MSU vs St. John's University vs Schiller International University vs Center for Creative Leadership

Side-by-side comparison from 186 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Montana State University - MSU: wins 0/5 categories
St. John's University: wins 0/5 categories
Schiller International University: wins 1/5 categories
Center for Creative Leadership: wins 3/5 categories
Flatiron School: wins 1/5 categories
TETR College of Business: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Bozeman, Montana, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Conservation Biology
New York City, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Chemistry
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.60
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Best programme: Psychology of Human Resources Development
New York City, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business
New York City, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Management & Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
4.00
4.00
3.92
5.00
Win
4.00
4.33
Location
4.23
5.00
4.50
4.93
5.00
4.00
4.67
Professors
4.38
4.00
4.25
4.64
5.00
Win
4.00
4.25
Internationality
4.39
3.00
4.25
4.93
Win
4.00
4.00
4.50
Student life
4.14
4.00
4.00
4.15
5.00
Win
4.00
4.33
Value
4.06
5.00
4.25
4.29
5.00
4.00
4.25
Accommodation
3.58
4.00
3.75
3.62
3.00
5.00
Win
4.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Industry relevance and practical skills
  • +International exposure and diverse student body
  • +Career opportunities and personal development
  • +High-quality, challenging, and engaging academic programs
  • +Excellent opportunities for career preparation and internships
  • +Supportive and beautiful campus environment with community engagement
  • +Supportive supervisors and accessible postgraduate programs
  • +Abundant student organizations and walkable campus
  • +Helpful staff and faculty for student issues
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and career growth
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment
  • +Student-centered support and inclusivity
  • +Welcoming and understanding community
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable staff and comprehensive curriculum
  • +Strong job placement and career support
  • +Experiential learning and business creation
  • +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
  • +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
  • -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment
  • -Lack of resources and support
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
  • -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
  • -Communication is frequently unclear and inadequate.
  • -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
Rating summary
What students say

Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.

This institution demonstrates a strong presence in key areas, excelling with perfect scores for its location and value. Facilities, professors, student life, and accommodation also received solid ratings of 4. The university's weakest area, internationality, scored a respectable 3. Overall, the feedback suggests a well-rounded experience with standout positives.

The university demonstrates a consistently strong performance across multiple aspects. Its location and internationality are particularly well-regarded, achieving the highest ratings. Professors and value also receive excellent scores. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which, while still good, is rated lower than other categories. Student life and facilities are also solid, indicating a well-rounded experience.

The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.

Overall, this institution garners consistently strong reviews across key aspects. Its strongest area is undoubtedly accommodation, receiving a perfect score, while facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and perceived value all achieve a solid 4 out of 5. This indicates a well-rounded university experience with a particular advantage in housing.

This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight excellent departments, quality education, and strong internship programs. Campus beauty and opportunities for connection are also praised.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.25 average rating. Students highlight competitive programs, helpful supervisors, affordable postgraduate options, and engaging campus life with many organizations. A small amount of feedback noted recent tuition increases and changes post-pandemic.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.

With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the student experience is highly positive (~100%). The reviewer highlights knowledgeable and supportive staff, a well-structured curriculum, and strong job placement resources.

With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
100%
25%
71%
100%
0%
60%
4★
42%
0%
75%
21%
0%
100%
20%
3★
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
2★
1%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Loving it here!

Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close