Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences vs Centria University of Applied Sciences vs Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences - SeAMK
Side-by-side comparison from 102 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Interdisciplinary studies and cross-major flexibility
- +Independent learning and hands-on, practical experiences
- +Strong community support and active student life
- +Passionate, supportive, and communicative educators
- +Practical, career-focused programmes and real-world connections
- +International atmosphere and flexible learning paths
- +Supportive environment and approachable staff
- +Practical, business-focused curriculum with real-world application
- +International community and diverse learning experiences
- +Supportive professors and practical learning
- +Global opportunities and accessible location
- +Personal development and useful knowledge acquisition
- +International environment and intercultural exchange
- +Supportive staff and excellent student guidance
- +Diverse and flexible study programs with practical skills
- +Approachable professors & strong academic programs
- +Welcoming city & positive student community
- +Good accommodation & proximity to campus
Nothing to show
- -Lack of responsiveness and clarity from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Insufficient academic support and resources.
- -Inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff creates confusion.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unresponsive management create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff leads to confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacts student experience.
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a problem.
Nothing to show
This institution exhibits a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, which received the highest rating. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also scored very well. The **Location** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, though it still falls within a generally positive range. The university demonstrates a commendable balance across its assessed aspects.
This institution earns exceptionally high marks, particularly in the **professors** category with a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **internationality** also stand out with strong ratings. Areas receiving slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **student life** and **accommodation**. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded positive profile.
Exceptional marks are awarded for its **location** (4.86) and **internationality** (4.75), showcasing significant strengths. **Facilities** also score highly at 4.38. Conversely, **professors** represent the weakest area with a rating of 3.63. **Student life** (3.86) and **accommodation** (3.88) are moderately rated, while **value** sits at a respectable 4.13.
Overall, this institution garners strong marks, with accommodation and value standing out as exceptional strengths, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality are all rated highly, demonstrating a consistently positive experience across these key aspects.
Overall, the university receives high marks. Student life stands out as the strongest area, closely followed by facilities and internationality. Accommodations and location also score very well. Value for money is a notable strength. The professors' ratings, while still good, represent the weakest area in this assessment.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings across several key areas. Facilities and professors are particularly well-regarded, both receiving 4.25. Internationality is also a positive, scoring a 4. Value for money is also strong at 4.125. The weakest areas appear to be student life (3.71) and location and accommodation, both rated at 3.875.
Nothing to show
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) with an average rating of 4.44/5. Recurring themes highlight the value of interdisciplinary studies, independent learning, and strong community support.
All 26 reviews are positive, averaging 4.88/5. Students praise practical, student-centered education, supportive teachers, and innovation. A minor concern was difficulty securing clinical practice due to language skills.
With a 4.22/5 average, ~88% of reviews are positive, praising supportive staff, international programs, and practical business learning. Some students desire more social and extracurricular activities. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a 4/5 average rating and no negative feedback (~0%), students praise freedom to develop, practical learning, and supportive professors. The university's global network and accessible location with affordable accommodation are also highlighted.
Students praise SEAMK for its international environment, supportive staff, and diverse courses. The learning atmosphere is described as friendly and inclusive, with excellent guidance and opportunities for intercultural exchange. No negative feedback was provided in the sample.
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise well-structured programs, approachable professors, and a strong sense of community. The city of Turku is also frequently mentioned as a positive aspect.
Nothing to show
I graduated from Aalto University's School of Business, majoring in Marketing, and I'd genuinely recommend it. What made the biggest difference for me, though, was the freedom to take courses outside my own major. I ended up mixing in some technology and design courses with my marketing courses, and that has turned out to be one of the most useful parts of my degree.
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Nothing to show
Centria UAS is a good university where students feel free to develop themselves and learn useful knowledge. The school has a broad Erasmus network and other partners around the world. Professors at Centria are qualified and enthusiastic in their lectures. They are always willing to help and encourage students in any problems. The theory is practically applied in every lesson via teamwork, presentations, and assignments. Cheap accommodation and easy to access to the school due to a good location. Staff are very friendly, helpful and polite. I have enjoyed a great time at Centria and went on a Double degree exchange program in France which would be obviously a great opportunity for my career prospects. About Kokkola, it is a small town with all warmhearted and helpful people. I always feel safe when staying here. This place is like my second home.
The school has great facilities and modern equipment. Teachers have huge amount of knowledge and are well informed about new technologies. The studying is made mostly in a way that the student doesn't have to buy expensive books or equipments. Also the school is really investing on being international and there is lot of collaboration between different schools from different countries although they should advertise about exchange programs more.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
