University of Plovdiv Paisii Hilendarski vs Qatar University vs College of the North Atlantic Qatar vs Hamad bin Khalifa University vs Prague International Business School - PIBS

Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: CUC Ulster University - CUCUU (5.00)
University of Plovdiv Paisii Hilendarski: wins 0/7 categories
Qatar University: wins 1/7 categories
College of the North Atlantic Qatar: wins 0/7 categories
Hamad bin Khalifa University: wins 0/7 categories
Prague International Business School - PIBS: wins 1/7 categories
CUC Ulster University - CUCUU: wins 5/7 categories
Catholic University Santo Toribio De Mogrovejo - USAT: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: English Philology
Best programme: Accounting and Management Information Systems
Best programme: International Management
Best programme: Computer Science
Category ratings
Facilities
2.75
4.20
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Location
3.25
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.25
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
3.90
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
3.25
3.30
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Win
Not rated
Value
3.75
3.80
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
2.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and practical skills
  • +Outstanding and supportive teaching staff
  • +Engaging and relevant program content
  • +Excellent academic programs and high-quality education
  • +Valuable practical experience and real-life projects
  • +Strong reputation, numerous opportunities, and qualified faculty

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Transformative learning experiences and career purpose
  • +Dedicated professors, critical thinking, and open dialogue
  • +Vibrant student community and lifelong connections
  • +Helpful professors and friendly peers
  • +Modern facilities and technological resources
  • +Opportunity for a UK degree in Qatar

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as irrelevant and uninspiring.
  • -Exclusionary practices and language barriers
  • -Segregated facilities and programs

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are common complaints.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of transparency from the institution are prevalent concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a concern.
  • -Communication problems and lack of clear information are prevalent.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its value for money, with a rating of 3.75. Professors, location, and student life also received solid marks of 3.25. Conversely, the facilities and accommodation areas present areas for improvement, scoring 2.75 and 2.5 respectively. Internationality is rated at a moderate 3.

This institution excels in its **location**, boasting a near-perfect score. Facilities and professors also receive very strong marks. However, **student life** presents an area for potential improvement, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Accommodations, internationality, and value are rated favorably, though not reaching the same exceptional levels as location and academics.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **location**, earning a perfect score. Its **facilities**, **professors**, and **internationality** are also well-regarded, all receiving strong ratings. Conversely, areas such as **student life** and **accommodation** present opportunities for improvement, as indicated by their moderate scores. The overall **value** also lands in the middle tier, reflecting a mixed but generally positive assessment.

This institution excels in several key areas, notably receiving perfect scores for professors, accommodation, internationality, and value. Student life is also highly rated. The weakest aspect is its location, which received zero points. Facilities, while not perfect, still scored a respectable 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight high-quality education, qualified professors, and strong programs. Some mention a few irrelevant courses and bureaucratic challenges.

Seven out of ten reviews are positive, with students praising academic quality, opportunities, and practical learning. One review expressed concerns about exclusion due to language and program segregation.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university receives a highly positive rating of 4/5 from its students. The single review highlights transformative academic experiences, supportive professors, and a vibrant student community with ample opportunities for involvement and connection.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive. Students praise the university's fun atmosphere, helpful professors and peers, and good facilities. The prospect of a new campus and earning a UK degree in Qatar are highlights.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
29%
40%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
43%
30%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
29%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close