Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso - UFMT vs Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas vs SKEMA Business School vs Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 217 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.60)
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso - UFMT: wins 0/7 categories
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas: wins 2/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/7 categories
Universidade Estadual de Londrina: wins 4/7 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor's Degree in Medicine
Best programme: Applied Economics
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Acting
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.75
4.67
Win
4.21
3.58
4.40
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.50
4.50
4.23
4.11
4.70
Win
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.63
4.50
4.39
4.31
4.60
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
4.17
4.40
3.41
4.60
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
3.88
4.40
4.14
4.03
3.90
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.13
4.50
Win
4.07
4.28
3.90
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.75
4.20
3.59
3.04
3.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Exceptional faculty and qualified professors
  • +Good campus facilities and infrastructure
  • +Career-boosting programs and support
  • +Excellent professors and comprehensive curriculum
  • +Strong market preparation and multicultural insights
  • +Good infrastructure and organized institution
  • +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
  • +Experienced professors with practical application
  • +Accessible and diverse learning opportunities
  • +Quality education meeting student expectations
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +Inclusive and diverse student community
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +High-quality and relevant academic programs

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of research support.
  • -Poor career guidance and pathway planning.
  • -Overcrowded and outdated facilities.
  • -Lack of communication from administration and disorganized management.
  • -Limited course offerings and outdated curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
  • -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common frustrations.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a significant concern.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Academic quality stands out, with professors receiving an impressive 4.625, closely followed by its advantageous location at 4.5. Conversely, internationality scored the lowest at 3.5. Other aspects like facilities, accommodation, and student life fall within a solid mid-range. The university offers good value for its offerings, indicated by a 4.125 score in that area.

This institution scores particularly well in its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.67. **Professors**, **location**, and **value** also stand out with strong marks of 4.5. The **student life** is rated positively at 4.4. Among the surveyed areas, **internationality** at 4.17 and **accommodation** at 4.2 received the lowest, though still respectable, scores.

This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.

This university receives its highest marks for Professors (4.32) and Value (4.25). Location (4.08) and Student Life (4.00) also scored well. Conversely, Accomodation (3.04) and Internationality (3.36) represent the weakest areas, with Facilities (3.58) falling in the middle. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in academic quality and financial benefit, while improvements may be considered in student living arrangements and global engagement.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. It shines with perfect marks for its professors and student life, and boasts high ratings in internationality, facilities, location, and accommodation. The sole area receiving a comparatively lower score, though still strong, is its overall value.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Eight out of nine reviews are positive (approximately 89%), highlighting exceptional faculty, a strong educational experience, and a good campus with great infrastructure. One review (approximately 11%) notes issues with infrastructure and career support.

With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~71% of feedback is positive, praising excellent professors, good infrastructure, and comprehensive programs. A small portion of feedback noted minor imperfections in technological features and graduation program structure.

Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.

Students highly recommend this university, with ~93% of feedback being positive. Recurring themes include dedicated, practical professors and valuable learning opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~7%) mentions infrastructure needing maintenance.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted inclusive learning environments and supportive faculty. Excellent infrastructure and a relevant curriculum were also noted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
56%
57%
50%
43%
60%
0%
0%
4★
33%
14%
42%
50%
40%
100%
0%
3★
0%
29%
7%
7%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
11%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close