University Hassan II of Casablanca vs Faculté des Sciences Ben M'Sick - FSBM vs National School Of Commerce And Management - ENCG vs Higher Institute of Business Administration - ISCAE vs Institute of Agri-food Technology and Applied Engineering - ISFORT MAROC

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University Hassan II of Casablanca: wins 0/4 categories
Faculté des Sciences Ben M'Sick - FSBM: wins 0/4 categories
National School Of Commerce And Management - ENCG: wins 0/4 categories
Higher Institute of Business Administration - ISCAE: wins 0/4 categories
Institute of Agri-food Technology and Applied Engineering - ISFORT MAROC: wins 4/4 categories
ESCA Ecole de Management: wins 0/4 categories
HESTIM Engineering and Business School: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Best programme: Finance
Best programme: Food Science and Technology
Casablanca, Morocco
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
2.67
Not rated
3.50
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Location
3.25
Not rated
4.50
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Professors
3.92
Not rated
3.50
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Internationality
2.92
Not rated
3.50
5.00
5.00
5.00
3.00
Student life
3.17
Not rated
3.50
5.00
5.00
5.00
3.00
Value
3.62
Not rated
3.50
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
3.00
Accommodation
2.42
Not rated
2.50
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive faculty and welcoming professors
  • +Accessible and affordable education
  • +Vibrant campus life and diverse community

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality academic programs and teaching
  • +Excellent facilities and learning environment
  • +Positive overall school experience
  • +Rigorous and relevant curriculum
  • +High-quality faculty with industry experience
  • +Practical application of knowledge
  • +Strong faculty mentorship and commitment
  • +Relevant, practical, and innovative curriculum
  • +Alignment with job market realities
  • +AACSB accreditation and high educational quality

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated teaching methods and equipment.
  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administration.
  • -Poor communication and non-existent services.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support frustrates learners.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching and relevant course content is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring concern.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of support.
  • -Excessive administrative bureaucracy and communication problems.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university exhibits a varied performance across key areas. Professors are a clear strength, receiving a high rating. Conversely, facilities and accommodation present as the weakest points, with notably lower scores. Student life and internationality are rated moderately, while location and value fall in the upper-mid range.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university presents a solid academic experience. It shines in its **location**, which received a high rating. Areas like **facilities**, **professors**, **student life**, and **internationality** are rated moderately well, suggesting a good but not exceptional experience in these aspects. The weakest area appears to be **accommodation**, scoring significantly lower than other categories. **Value** is rated averagely.

This institution garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in its **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all achieving a perfect 5. Facilities, Professors, Accommodation, and Value are also well-regarded with a solid 4. There are no particularly weak areas, with all scores being strong.

Receiving a perfect score of 5 across all categories, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength in every area. Notably, facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are all rated at the highest possible level. No specific weaknesses are identified, suggesting a consistently outstanding experience for students.

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly excelling in Location, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving perfect scores. Its Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value are also well-regarded, earning a strong 4 out of 5. This suggests a university that offers a vibrant and globally connected experience with excellent support systems, while its core academic and infrastructural offerings are solid and dependable.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 57% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive faculty and diverse campus life. A smaller portion, around 14.3%, mentions outdated methods and administrative issues. The average rating is 3.43/5.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight the good teachers, administration, learning environment, and well-equipped facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.

With one review and an average rating of 5/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the enriching academic experience and relevant curriculum.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive (100% positive), with a 5/5 average rating. Students highlight the program's exceptional design, faculty commitment, and focus on innovation and industry relevance. No negative feedback was provided.

This university has a strong positive reputation, with approximately 100% of feedback being positive. The main highlight is its AACSB accreditation and good quality of education.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
50%
100%
100%
0%
0%
4★
57%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
29%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close