Ecole Nationale des Sciences Appliquées de Kenitra - ENSAK vs ESSEC Business School vs International Management Forum (IMF) vs Ibn Tofail University - UIT vs University of Guelph-Humber - GH

Side-by-side comparison from 86 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Ecole Nationale des Sciences Appliquées de Kenitra - ENSAK (5.00)
Ecole Nationale des Sciences Appliquées de Kenitra - ENSAK: wins 0/7 categories
ESSEC Business School: wins 2/7 categories
International Management Forum (IMF): wins 0/7 categories
Ibn Tofail University - UIT: wins 2/7 categories
University of Guelph-Humber - GH: wins 0/7 categories
Indonesia University of Education - UPI: wins 3/7 categories
Universite des Mascareignes - UdM: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Biology
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.31
Not rated
4.38
Win
4.31
4.29
Not rated
Location
Not rated
3.53
Not rated
4.00
4.06
4.86
Win
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
4.38
Win
4.19
4.29
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.46
3.81
4.29
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
4.42
Not rated
3.85
3.88
4.50
Win
Not rated
Value
Not rated
4.40
Win
Not rated
4.15
4.25
4.14
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
3.65
Not rated
3.58
4.13
4.29
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse engineering majors and foundational learning
  • +Abundant extracurricular opportunities
  • +High-quality, knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic rigor and valuable skill development
  • +Welcoming environment with good campus facilities and opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and inclusive learning environment
  • +Committed and professional faculty
  • +Opportunities for personal and skill development
  • +Supportive professors and a close-knit community
  • +Small class sizes with hands-on learning
  • +Beneficial co-op placements and modern facilities
  • +Supportive environment and approachable lecturers
  • +Strong career preparation through diverse opportunities
  • +Modern facilities and vibrant campus atmosphere

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment
  • -Lack of clear communication and support
  • -Administrative and management issues are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor accommodation are common complaints.
  • -Location is inconvenient and perceived as unsafe at night.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently cited.
  • -Communication and administrative issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Lack of support and unclear expectations negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a common complaint.
  • -Students experience frustration with administrative and management inefficiencies.
  • -A lack of engaging and relevant curriculum is frequently mentioned.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
  • -A lack of clear communication and responsiveness from staff is frequently cited.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform rating of zero across all surveyed categories, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Consequently, no specific areas stand out as strengths or weaknesses, as all aspects of the university appear to be rated equally low.

This university receives commendable feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest aspect, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Value also perform very well, indicating a positive experience and good return on investment for students. Conversely, Location and Accommodation are areas where the university is rated less favorably, suggesting potential for improvement in these particular domains.

Nothing to show

This university achieves strong marks in academic and campus resources, boasting excellent ratings for its **Facilities** and **Professors**. While **Location** also scores well, **Student Life** and **Accomodation** show room for improvement. The university's **Internationality** is rated lower compared to other aspects, though its **Value** proposition remains positive, indicating a generally favorable overall assessment.

With a diverse set of ratings, the institution excels in its **Facilities**, earning a strong 4.31. **Professors** and **Value** also received commendable scores, indicating robust academic and economic benefits. Conversely, **Student Life** and **Internationality** received the lowest marks, suggesting these areas could benefit from further development. **Location** and **Accomodation** sit comfortably in the middle range of evaluations.

This institution demonstrates strong performance across several key areas. Location stands out as its highest-rated aspect. Student life also receives positive marks. While generally well-regarded, the university's value for money is its lowest-scoring category, though still within a positive range. Facilities, professors, accommodation, and internationality all hover around a similar, favorable rating.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The single review rates the university 5/5, indicating a highly positive sentiment (~100%). The feedback highlights a variety of engineering majors and extracurriculars.

With a 4.45 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, praising knowledgeable professors, excellent financial support, and enriching academic environments. A small portion (~2%) noted location and accommodation concerns.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.08/5 from 13 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive. Students highlight an inclusive, merit-based environment with supportive lecturers and a conducive learning atmosphere.

With an average rating of 4.25/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise informative teaching, beneficial advice, and small class sizes that foster close relationships with professors. Modern facilities, inclusive community, and co-op opportunities are also highlighted.

All 7 reviews are positive, reflecting a 100% positive sentiment. Students highlight a supportive environment, advanced facilities, good faculty, and opportunities for career preparation. Minor administrative inefficiencies were noted in a few comments.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
55%
0%
31%
44%
29%
0%
4★
0%
39%
0%
46%
38%
71%
0%
3★
0%
4%
0%
23%
19%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

ESSEC BBA : It's worth it

Essec BBA is a well known program if you want to attend a business school. The teaching is qualitative as the teachers usually are reputed experts in their fields. As far as it concerns the campus, you cannot complain about the diversity and quality of high tech equipment or the comfortable auditoriums. Pretty much everything is made for you to feel at ease and evolve as an ESSEC student. One of the rare things I could point out is the school campus location which is pretty much isolated and a bit far from the centre of Paris, otherwise, you can take public transport, easy to use and practical for your everyday student life.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

UofGH Review

The Media and Communications professors are lovely, and I've rarely had a problem with bad professors. A few frustrating ones, but never outright bad in my eyes. The classes are fine, though a bit boring in the 3rd year, and I find myself using the extra time for personal projects or reading.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close