University of Virginia - UVA vs NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences vs Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora vs UCEN Manchester vs Govt Shaheed Smrity College - GSS College
Side-by-side comparison from 209 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +strong academic programs and well-taught courses
- +unique culture and supportive environment
- +practical skills and career preparation
- +Practical, project-based learning and real-world application
- +Welcoming atmosphere and supportive community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Strong curriculum and faculty
- +Friendly student body
- +Overall positive experience despite infrastructure issues
- +Supportive and friendly staff and tutors.
- +Positive social environment and making friends.
- +Engaging and beneficial course content.
- +Friendly and helpful teachers
- +Positive social environment and friendships
- +Strong internationalization efforts
- +Accessible, high-quality education and strong theoretical foundation
- +Skilled, knowledgeable professors and research training
- +Free and diverse learning environment
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -A lack of clear communication and transparency causes dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of organization and poor management pervade all aspects of the institution.
- -Ineffective communication and a general lack of teacher availability and feedback leave students unsupported.
- -Unclear assignments and inconsistent assessment practices create confusion and frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common source of dissatisfaction.
- -Course content and delivery methods are often perceived as poor or irrelevant.
- -Course content and career relevance are misleading.
- -Poorly managed administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of resources and support hampers learning effectively.
- -Administrative disorganization and unfulfilled school services.
- -Outdated curriculum and ineffective teaching.
- -Lack of career advancement opportunities post-graduation.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities are a common complaint.
- -Unclear communication and poor course structure frustrate students.
This university garners strong marks across several key areas. Facilities and student life are particularly well-regarded, both scoring above 4.4. Accommodation and internationality also receive high praise. While professors' ratings are slightly lower than other aspects, they remain solid. Location and value are rated comparably, indicating a consistent experience in these domains.
Exceptional ratings were awarded to the university's **Facilities** (4.43) and **Internationality** (4.47). **Student Life** also scored well at 4.08 and **Value** at 3.98. The area requiring the most attention appears to be **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating at 3.65, with **Professors** also scoring moderately lower than other categories at 3.81.
A mixed but generally positive evaluation emerges from these ratings. The university excels in its professors, location, and student life, all receiving perfect scores. However, its facilities stand out as a significant weakness, earning only two out of five. Accommodations and internationality are rated moderately, with value for money also performing well.
Facilities stand out as the university's highest-rated aspect, followed closely by professors, location, and student life, all receiving strong marks. Accommodations also score well. However, internationality and value for money are the areas with the lowest ratings, suggesting room for improvement in these categories.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, most notably for its **Professors and Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, Location, and Accommodation are also well-regarded, each earning a solid 4. The university's weakest area, however, lies in its **Internationality**, which received a moderate rating of 3. Overall, the Value for money is rated positively at 4.
This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across key areas. Its strongest point is **Internationality**, receiving a significantly higher rating than other categories. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Professors** are identified as the weakest aspects, both scoring at the lowest mark. Student life, accommodation, and value also fall within a similar moderate range.
Academic strengths shine through with excellent ratings for **Professors** (4.5) and a solid score for **Location** (4). The university also scores well on **Value** (4). However, **Accomodation** (2.5) stands out as a significant weakness, alongside a moderate rating for **Student Life** (3). **Facilities** (3.5) and **Internationality** (3) fall within the average range.
With a high average rating of 4.22/5 and no 1-2 star reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise the unique culture, strong academic programs in architecture and engineering, and supportive learning environments.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning, ample opportunities, and a welcoming atmosphere. A small percentage of negative feedback cites disorganization and communication issues.
With an average rating of 4/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights a solid curriculum and friendly students. Limited negative feedback did not provide specific recurring themes.
University feedback is largely positive (~74% of reviews), with students praising supportive staff and a friendly atmosphere. A small percentage of negative feedback (~9%) mentions concerns about course relevance.
This university has a perfect 5/5 average rating from 1 review. The positive feedback (~100%) highlights enjoyment and supportive, kind teachers. No negative reviews were provided.
With an average rating of 2/5, ~67% of reviews are negative. Students cite disorganization, outdated curriculum, and lack of career advancement. One positive review notes internationalization efforts.
With a 3.5/5 average rating, feedback suggests a highly positive experience (~50%), highlighting accessible, high-quality education with skilled professors. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
Studying Creative Business at NHL Stenden has been a great experience with a few bumps down the road. Generally speaking, I'm very glad about my choice to study here - as an international student I am surrounded by other internationals which makes me feel more welcome and comfortable; this university has provided me with numerous extracurricular opportunities, which were not only great for networking and finding like-minded connections, but also getting extremely nice and useful experience, whether it's working on a real set with professional production equipment or creating content and representing my course on social media! When it comes to the study itself, it usually is pretty confusing, as students are usually just thrown into practical projects without initial preparation and sometimes not enough guidance. However, once you get used to design-based education, you realize how exciting the assignments actually are - working with real clients, producing your own ideas and seeing them come to life, and just "creativity, creativity, creativity" everywhere. I recommend this university for those who are not afraid of teamwork, thinking outside of the box, and being independent.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
