Politecnico di Milano vs Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - UCSC vs NABA – New Academy of Fine Arts vs POLIMI Graduate School of Management vs European School of Economics - ESE
Side-by-side comparison from 171 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Innovative and challenging academic programs
- +Excellent organization and guidance for students
- +Strong professor quality and available resources
- +Excellent professors and inspiring atmosphere.
- +Strong career building opportunities and professional connections.
- +Inclusive and supportive environment.
- +Outstanding teachers and a supportive, family-like community.
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth in a well-resourced environment.
- +An international atmosphere with diverse student interactions.
- +Innovative and forward-looking curriculum
- +Strong career development and industry connections
- +Flexible and student-friendly learning environment
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
Nothing to show
- +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
- +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
- -Professors have poor teaching performance and lack of course support.
- -Grading systems and exams are arbitrary and designed to be tricky.
- -The educational approach discourages experimentation and free thinking.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support, are frequently criticized.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of practical application and unclear curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
Offering a generally positive student experience, this institution excels in **Internationality** and **Value**, both scoring above 4.2. **Location** also garners high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest-rated aspect, while **Facilities** receive a comparatively moderate score. Professors and Student Life are rated favorably around the 4.0 mark.
Student feedback indicates a strong performance in **Location**, with an impressive rating of 4.49. **Value** and **Professors** also received high marks, suggesting these are particular strengths. Conversely, **Accommodations** emerged as the weakest area, scoring 3.27. **Student Life** and **Internationality** received similar average ratings, while **Facilities** performed moderately well.
This institution receives commendations across several key areas. Its strongest performance is in **Internationality**, with a rating of 4.67. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value are also highly rated, each scoring 4.33. Student Life and Accomodation are solid, both receiving a score of 4.
The university scores exceptionally well in Student Life and Internationality, both receiving perfect marks. Its Facilities and Value also stand out with strong ratings of 4.5. Professors and Location are solid at 4.0. The lowest-rated area is Accomodation, with a score of 3.5. This indicates a positive overall experience, particularly for social engagement and global integration.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
Nothing to show
This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic programs, helpful administration, and good facilities. Negative feedback (~5.3%) briefly mentions some professors' teaching effectiveness and exam ambiguity.
With 37 positive reviews and an average rating of 4.36/5, students praise excellent professors, advanced equipment, and an inclusive, open-minded environment. There are no negative reviews.
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.38/5. Students consistently praise outstanding teachers, a supportive environment with compassionate individuals, and abundant resources, fostering personal growth and strong connections.
All reviews are positive, with students praising the program's focus on finance technology, career prospects, and the supportive, organized learning environment. The university is described as flexible and student-friendly.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.
I have experienced a lot of personalities in this university, some lecturers are very rude when you ask questions, like the thought of you even being slightly confused at what theyre saying is a crime, while some are eager to answer your questions and even welcome it, all in all i personally focus on the good ones because i am here for a purpose. But if you're really sensitive and these things are what you look out for, then this might come as a shock to you.
As an international student, my experience at Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore has been transformative. The university’s inclusive environment fosters a deep sense of belonging, making it easy to adapt to a new culture. Professors are approachable and deeply knowledgeable, providing an enriching academic experience that combines theory with practical insights. The campus is vibrant, offering a blend of modern facilities and historic charm, creating an inspiring atmosphere for learning. With diverse extracurricular activities and opportunities to connect with students from around the world, Cattolica truly embodies a global community. It’s a place where personal and academic growth thrive.
I liked the ambiant, the friendly people, professional professors, the care of details. I had the opportunity to improve myself and find out more about me, my skills and what I'm looking for in a job.
The program offers great technological and concrete competencies of the technology applied to the financial sector. Students are highly motivated and fun to be around. The courses are highly linked to innovative and forward-looking topics and deliver great career prospects.
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
