Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Eindhoven University of Technology - TU/e vs University of Twente vs Fontys University of Applied Sciences vs Breda University of Applied Sciences

Side-by-side comparison from 204 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam: wins 3/7 categories
Eindhoven University of Technology - TU/e: wins 3/7 categories
University of Twente: wins 1/7 categories
Fontys University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
Breda University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
International Management Forum (IMF): wins 0/7 categories
IMF Academy: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: B.Sc. in Psychology
Best programme: Computer Science
Enschede, The Netherlands
4.30
Read more reviews
48 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Creative Business
Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.06
4.56
Win
4.38
4.31
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.29
4.53
Win
4.14
4.12
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.31
Win
4.23
3.90
4.12
3.29
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.46
Win
4.20
4.12
4.12
3.57
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.19
Win
3.97
3.98
3.69
3.14
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.21
4.34
Win
4.19
4.12
2.71
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.15
3.50
3.74
Win
3.29
2.14
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging academics and strong program content
  • +Vibrant international and multicultural community
  • +Opportunities for practical application and personal growth
  • +Innovative, problem-solving engineering focus
  • +Dedicated, knowledgeable, and supportive lecturers
  • +Engaging learning, personal development, and strong community
  • +Diverse and multicultural learning environment.
  • +Flexible, research-oriented, and hands-on academic programs.
  • +Supportive community and innovative campus facilities.
  • +Supportive and caring staff
  • +Practical and international experience opportunities
  • +Strong preparation for the job industry
  • +Strong industry-relevant skill development and career preparation.
  • +Supportive and professional faculty guidance.
  • +Opportunities for creativity and broad learning.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources impede learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are significant drawbacks.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible and unengaging course content fails to meet student needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support for students is a major concern.
  • -Lack of perceived learning and skills development.
  • -Poor quality of personnel and learning environment.
  • -Administrative and management indifference to student concerns.
  • -Lack of clear career relevance and transferability of skills.
  • -Programmatic issues, including misleading international focus and language barriers.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas, notably Internationality, which earned a high score. Professors and Location also received very positive feedback. The university's performance in Student Life and Value is also solid. However, Accomodation stands out as a weaker area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Facilities also received a moderate rating.

This institution garners strong approval for its facilities and location, both scoring above 4.5. Professors and internationality also receive positive marks, exceeding 4.2. Student life ratings are solid at nearly 4.0. The weakest areas appear to be accommodation, with a score of 3.5, and value, which is rated at 4.35.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Facilities**, which received the highest rating. Students also rated **Value** and **Location** highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest score, while **Professors** and **Student Life** also scored moderately lower compared to other aspects. The overall profile indicates a positive student experience with room for improvement in specific domains.

This institution scores remarkably well in several key areas. Facilities stand out with a rating of 4.31. Professors, location, internationality, and value also receive strong marks, all averaging around 4.12. Student life scores a respectable 3.69, while accommodation emerges as the lowest-rated category at 3.29.

Analyzing the provided ratings, the university demonstrates its strongest performance in Location, receiving a perfect score. Facilities also fare well, with a rating of 3.86. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring a low 2.14. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a ~100% positive sentiment and an average rating of 4.3/5, students praise the multicultural environment, strong academic programs with practical applications, and supportive faculty. They also highlight engaging extracurriculars and a positive campus experience.

With ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.35/5, students praise the university's focus on engineering, innovation, and real-world problem-solving. They highlight engaging courses, dedicated lecturers, and a supportive academic environment.

With 43 positive reviews out of 48, students praise academic and social benefits, enjoyable learning experiences, and multi-cultural environments. The average rating is 4.31/5.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive staff, good programs, and practical experience. A smaller portion, ~7.4%, expresses concerns about program structure, learning outcomes, and personnel quality.

Around 57% of reviews are positive, highlighting skill development and professional support. However, about 29% of feedback points to program content not meeting expectations and limited career preparation.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
41%
41%
42%
22%
14%
0%
0%
4★
48%
53%
48%
56%
43%
0%
0%
3★
11%
6%
10%
15%
14%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
4%
14%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
4%
14%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
:)

As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.

Freedom and Opportunities

My experience within TU/e is overall positive mainly due to the student focused approach that the university utilises in order to accomodate new students and make them feel at home. One of the ways this was achieved was by having a vast variety of student associations for absolutely every hobby that one might have. On top of that, the university promotes and encourages the participation within student teams which is a perfect bridge between studying and working as you get to experience how a real work environment functions while being surrounded by students. The university also provides different levels of guidance so that one can tackle any problem they face.

Interactive courses

A good program to get to know different aspects of your study. Courses share an interaction with one main project in each quartile. Most teachers love their job and are interesting to listen to. The campus is set up really nicely, good to enjoy during breaks.

Studying at Fontys

I like the possibility to self study, find materials and information, as well as the freedom of learning what I am interested in, while receiving feedback from my teachers which helps me getting on the right track.

It's got positives and negatives

Very flexible in what you can choose, but the course can be very vague and push you into the marketing or film track. Other specializations don't get as many options for the graduation project. There are also some very passionate and good teachers at the school, but sometimes classes don't really follow with what you need to know for the deliverable

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close