Tampere University - TUNI vs Aalto University vs Tampere University of Applied Sciences - TAMK vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 128 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and flexible personal study plans
- +Welcoming international environment and diverse student body
- +Well-structured programs with practical application and research opportunities
- +Independent learning, study freedom, and flexible course options.
- +High-quality, practical education with accessible facilities.
- +Active student life and multidisciplinary collaboration opportunities.
- +Strong sense of community and support
- +Excellent teaching and learning atmosphere
- +Welcoming international environment and good facilities
- +Dedicated, supportive, and passionate faculty
- +Well-organized, modern campus and facilities
- +Strong industry connections and practical, future-focused education
- +Practical, business-oriented programmes with flexible scheduling
- +Supportive community and accessible guidance from professors and staff
- +High-quality education with experienced teachers and a friendly atmosphere
- +High-quality education and strong programs, especially in ICT and wireless technology.
- +Supportive and international learning environment with modern facilities.
- +Good city life, student culture, and career preparation support.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, particularly due to university reforms.
- -Administrative & management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
- -Limited resources and opportunities are a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and limited course offerings disappoint students.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and disorganized management plague student experiences.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create a frustrating learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff leads to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology were a significant drawback.
- -Lack of support and resources hindered learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common source of dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of effective teaching and engaging curriculum is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
The university garners significant acclaim, particularly in **Student Life**, which stands out with a 4.74 rating. **Facilities** also score very highly at 4.63. Areas such as **Accomodation** (4.24), **Professors** (4.26), and **Value** (4.26) show solid performance. **Internationality** is rated at 4.11, and **Location** is the lowest scored category at 4.06, though still strong.
This institution garners impressive scores across multiple facets. Student life stands out as its strongest area, closely followed by facilities. On the other hand, the professor rating presents as the comparatively weakest aspect, though still at a respectable level. The university also receives solid marks for location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, indicating a well-rounded experience.
The university scores well across multiple aspects, with **Location** and **Internationality** standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a rating of 4.33. **Professors** and **Student Life** are also rated highly at 4.17. The **Facilities** represent the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5, followed by **Value** at 3.67. **Accomodation** is rated a solid 4.
This institution garners exceptional scores, with Professors receiving the highest marks at 4.92 and Facilities a very close second at 4.8. Student Life and Location also scored highly, both above 4.5. The weakest area, though still strong, is Accomodation with a rating of 4.44. Internationality and Value are tied for the second-highest scores.
This institution garners impressive scores, particularly in **location** (4.89) and **internationality** (4.8). Facilities and student life are also well-regarded, each receiving a solid 4.0. Accommodation is rated similarly. The weakest area is **professors**, with a rating of 3.7, though the overall value for money remains strong at 4.2.
This institution excels significantly in its **Facilities** and **Value**, both receiving near-perfect scores. **Accomodation** is also a strong point. Conversely, the **Location** is the weakest area, indicating potential drawbacks in this aspect. **Student Life** and **Internationality** show moderate performance, suggesting room for improvement in fostering a vibrant campus experience and a more global outlook.
Nothing to show
With a 4.43 average rating from 35 reviews, approximately 74% praise the inclusive environment, supportive teachers, and flexible study plans. A small portion (~3%) notes declining teaching quality due to university reformation.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting interesting people, understanding professors, and freedom in studies. Students appreciate the multidisciplinary courses and independent learning approach, with access to excellent facilities.
Reviews indicate a strong sense of community and helpful staff, with ~74% of feedback being positive. Some suggestions for improvement include better funding for facilities and further development of international programs.
With a 4.89/5 average rating from 27 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight great professors, international focus, and excellent organization. Positive themes include modern facilities and strong industry connections.
With a ~82% positive sentiment, students praise concrete, business-oriented studies and flexibility. They also highlight a supportive, friendly community and a good work-life balance. Limited negative feedback was noted.
All 7 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the high-quality education, excellent facilities, and supportive, international environment, particularly in ICT and health tech. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I graduated from Aalto University's School of Business, majoring in Marketing, and I'd genuinely recommend it. What made the biggest difference for me, though, was the freedom to take courses outside my own major. I ended up mixing in some technology and design courses with my marketing courses, and that has turned out to be one of the most useful parts of my degree.
Nothing to show
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
