GEM Alpine Business School vs INSEAD Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs Clermont School of Business vs EM Strasbourg Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 200 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Deusto Business School (5.00)
GEM Alpine Business School: wins 0/7 categories
INSEAD Business School: wins 3/7 categories
EDHEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Clermont School of Business: wins 3/7 categories
EM Strasbourg Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Deusto Business School: wins 0/7 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Fontainebleau, France
4.60
Read more reviews
7 reviews
×
Best programme: MBA
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Clermont-Ferrand, France
4.90
Read more reviews
54 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor in International Management
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Master's Degree in Finance
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.10
4.43
Win
4.20
4.35
3.90
Not rated
3.43
Location
3.92
3.71
3.73
4.39
4.36
Not rated
4.64
Win
Professors
4.19
4.71
Win
4.32
4.48
4.17
Not rated
3.86
Internationality
4.06
4.43
4.41
4.78
Win
4.30
Not rated
4.50
Student life
4.20
4.00
4.14
4.43
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.07
Value
4.15
4.43
4.05
4.48
Win
4.17
Not rated
3.64
Accommodation
3.83
4.57
Win
3.14
4.15
3.90
1.00
2.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse faculty and global insights
  • +Innovative and relevant curriculum with real-world application
  • +Strong networking and international opportunities
  • +High-quality faculty and relevant curriculum
  • +Diverse and international peer community
  • +Practical learning and career opportunities
  • +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
  • +Strong alumni network and career services support
  • +International exposure and diverse student body
  • +Practical industry application and real-world expertise from professors.
  • +Diverse, international student community fostering multicultural experiences.
  • +Personalized academic journey with flexible course options.
  • +International focus and diverse student body
  • +Supportive and engaging faculty
  • +Dynamic student life and activities
  • +High academic standards and professional faculty
  • +Focus on holistic development, including values and social impact
  • +Rigorous and structured learning environment
  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
Cons
  • -Outdated and insufficient facilities are a consistent problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues lead to disorganization and frustration.
  • -Poor communication from the institution causes confusion and unmet expectations.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support leaves students feeling ignored.
  • -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
  • -Poor quality of teaching and relevance to career preparation.
  • -Lack of substantial learning and qualified speakers.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a frequent concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and transparency from instructors is a common complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
Rating summary
What students say

Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance. Student life stands out as a particularly strong area, closely followed by professors and overall value. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. The university also scores well in facilities, internationality, and location.

With exceptional scores, this institution excels in its professorial staff, earning a near-perfect 4.7. Accommodation and value are also highly rated, both exceeding 4.5. The university demonstrates strong international appeal and impressive facilities, each scoring 4.4. Student life is solid at 4.0. The location, however, is the lowest-rated aspect at 3.7.

Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.

This university garners strong evaluations across multiple aspects. Its internationality stands out as a particular strength, receiving the highest rating. Student life and professors are also highly regarded. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which, while still rated positively, falls below the university's other strong categories.

A review of university ratings reveals a well-rounded institution. The strongest aspects appear to be Location and Internationality, both scoring above 4.3. Professors and Value are also highly rated, at 4.17. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities and Accomodation, which received scores of approximately 3.9. Student Life sits at a solid 4.

The university's strongest aspect is its accommodation, receiving a perfect score. However, significant weaknesses are apparent across most other surveyed areas, with facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all scoring zero. This indicates considerable room for improvement in nearly all facets of the university experience outside of its housing provisions.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.34/5 average rating from 50 reviews, ~90% are positive. Students praise the supportive environment, valuable faculty insights, and innovative, tech-aligned courses. Some highlight group work stress and limited exchange program admission.

With a ~86% positive rating from 7 reviews, students highlight atmosphere, challenging programs, and learning new business skills. Some mention a packed curriculum and dislike of program location.

With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (around 98%), with an average rating of 4.68/5. Students praise the high-quality teaching, professors' real-world expertise, and the diverse, international student community. One negative review cited a lack of job-ready skills and unqualified speakers.

Students highly praise the university's international environment, supportive professors, and dynamic student life. Approximately 83% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews.

With an average rating of 5/5 and 100% positive feedback, students praise exceptional academic standards and dedicated faculty. They also highlight the university's focus on shaping empathetic humans with a commitment to social justice and positive global impact.

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

Rating distribution
5★
44%
71%
39%
76%
40%
200%
21%
4★
46%
14%
52%
24%
43%
0%
50%
3★
10%
14%
9%
2%
17%
0%
43%
2★
0%
0%
2%
2%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Positive feedback

Very good program offering rich training in different sectors of the commerce sector. The establishment has good infrastructure. She offers us good working materials for our projects. The Grenoble campus is not the best in France, but still very good There is a gym, classes, well equipped, amphitheatres, quite large and a beautiful cafeteria, it's not great luxury, but it has everything you need In our program, especially my year, we are lucky to have very good teachers who listen and who train us in an excellent way. This school nevertheless lacks international students compared to the top 5 of École de France, a business

diversity

like the atmosphere. Challenging program. Dislike the location of the program, too far away from city. The curriculum is very packed and the peers are very nice. Enjoying the program so far and defintely learning new business skills.

Enriching Experience

I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.

"An International and Engaging Learning Experience

As a student, I’ve been impressed by the professionalism and expertise of the professors, who bring real-world experience into the classroom, making learning both relevant and practical. The student body is equally diverse, with classmates from all over the world, which creates a rich, multicultural environment that enhances the overall experience. The administration also supports this international mix, ensuring that students from different countries feel welcomed and well-supported throughout their studies.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close