Technical University of Berlin - TU Berlin vs Royal Institute of Technology - KTH vs Chalmers University of Technology vs University of Engineering and Technology Taxila - UET vs New York College European and American Education - NYC

Side-by-side comparison from 56 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Technical University of Berlin - TU Berlin: wins 0/3 categories
Royal Institute of Technology - KTH: wins 2/3 categories
Chalmers University of Technology: wins 1/3 categories
University of Engineering and Technology Taxila - UET: wins 0/3 categories
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/3 categories
American Musical and Dramatic Academy - AMDA: wins 0/3 categories
Botswana International University of Science and Technology: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Best programme: Environmental Engineering
Best programme: Interaction Design
Best programme: Advanced Control and Systems Engineering
Los Angeles, California, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Acting
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.80
5.00
Win
3.75
Not rated
4.00
3.50
Location
3.94
4.20
5.00
3.40
Not rated
5.00
3.25
Professors
4.06
4.40
5.00
4.56
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Internationality
4.22
5.00
5.00
4.06
Not rated
4.00
3.75
Student life
4.06
4.60
Win
Not rated
4.06
Not rated
4.00
3.25
Value
4.00
4.80
5.00
4.17
Not rated
5.00
4.25
Accommodation
3.71
4.60
Win
Not rated
3.94
Not rated
4.00
3.25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and supportive faculty
  • +Practical application and research focus
  • +Flexible learning and vibrant student life
  • +World-class facilities and inspiring study atmosphere
  • +Strong academic programs with practical application and flexibility
  • +Engaging and approachable instructors
  • +Supportive and passionate lecturers
  • +Opportunities for practical project work and assignments
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty.
  • +Rigorous curriculum and practical learning opportunities.
  • +Vibrant campus and active extracurricular environment.
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs
  • +Motivating and inspiring teachers
  • +Strong sense of community and family atmosphere
  • +Supportive and friendly community
  • +Opportunities for academic and personal development
  • +High-quality facilities and engaging activities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are common complaints.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often criticized.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsive faculty create frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently cited.
  • -Communication breakdowns and a perceived lack of support from faculty and staff are prevalent complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate course materials hinder learning.
Rating summary
What students say

With an overall rating of 4, this institution demonstrates commendable strengths in **Internationality** (4.22) and **Student Life** (4.06), alongside solid scores for **Professors** and **Value**. Its **Accomodation** presents the area with the lowest score (3.71), suggesting potential for improvement in this aspect.

Exceptional marks were awarded in several key areas, notably a perfect score for **Internationality**. **Facilities** and **Value** also received very high ratings. The university performs well across **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, with solid scores for **Professors** and **Location**. While no area received a low rating, **Location** represents the comparatively weakest aspect among the surveyed categories.

This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, internationality, and overall value. Conversely, significant weaknesses are evident in student life and accommodation, both of which are rated at the lowest possible score. This indicates a strong academic and logistical offering, but a considerable deficit in social and residential support for students.

Across several key metrics, this university demonstrates a generally positive reception. Professors received the highest rating at 4.56, indicating a particular strength in academic instruction. Location, however, scored the lowest at 3.4, suggesting this might be an area for improvement. Other notable scores include strong performance in Value (4.17) and comparable high ratings for Student Life and Internationality.

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

This institution shines with exceptional scores in its professors, location, and overall value, all receiving a perfect 5 out of 5. Areas like facilities, student life, accommodation, and internationality are also well-regarded, each earning a solid 4. While no significant weaknesses are evident, the strongest aspects clearly lie in teaching quality, accessibility, and perceived worth.

This institution garners praise for its **exceptional value**, with a score of 4.25. Professors also receive strong marks at 4.0. Areas for potential improvement include its **facilities and location**, both scoring 3.25. Student life and accommodation are also rated at this level, while internationality stands out at 3.75, suggesting a positive but not universally outstanding experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4/5 average rating from 19 reviews, students praise strong academics, particularly in STEM fields, and appreciate research focus and practical application. Positive feedback highlights well-prepared professors and diverse learning opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

All 12 reviews are positive, averaging 4.75/5. Students praise world-class research facilities, inclusive culture, and opportunities for theory-practice integration. Friendly, engaging instructors and diverse, flexible courses are also highlighted.

The single review is highly positive, giving a perfect 5/5 rating. This indicates strong satisfaction with no negative feedback received.

With 15 out of 18 reviews being positive, students highlight knowledgeable and supportive faculty, rigorous curriculum, and a dynamic campus environment. No negative feedback was provided.

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university has a single highly positive review. The feedback highlights excellent teachers, strong community engagement, and a supportive atmosphere. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 4.25/5, 3 out of 4 reviews are positive (~75%). Students highlight critical thinking, a supportive community, and opportunities for academic and personal development. No negative feedback was reported.

Rating distribution
5★
21%
75%
100%
44%
0%
100%
50%
4★
58%
25%
0%
39%
100%
0%
25%
3★
21%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
25%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Maham

UET Taxila is absolutely fantastic! The professors are incredibly knowledgeable and supportive, which makes the learning experience truly exceptional. I've had an amazing time at UET Taxila Good experience Recommended

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close