Technical University of Berlin - TU Berlin vs European School of Management and Technology - ESMT Berlin vs SRH University of Applied Sciences vs IU International University of Applied Sciences vs Berlin School of Business and Innovation - BSBI
Side-by-side comparison from 253 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and supportive faculty
- +Practical application and research focus
- +Flexible learning and vibrant student life
- +Passionate, knowledgeable professors and engaging teaching
- +Practical, real-world-focused curriculum
- +Dynamic community and vibrant atmosphere
- +Practical, hands-on learning with modern equipment.
- +Supportive professors and small, international classes fostering discussion.
- +Strong academic programs and good company connections.
- +Flexible online learning and 24/7 exam availability
- +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access to materials
- +Practical, real-world aligned content and responsive support
- +Comprehensive programs and extracurriculars
- +Excellent student support and guidance
- +Balanced study-work-life mode
- +International and diverse community.
- +Interactive and engaging learning methods.
- +Opportunities for personal growth and broader perspectives.
- +Hands-on learning and practical experience
- +Access to professional gear and facilities
- +Supportive and collaborative environment
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of effective teaching and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are prevalent.
- -The financial office is perceived as rude and money-hungry.
- -Delayed grading and slow response times from administration.
- -Poor and unhelpful student support services.
- -Lack of timely academic guidance and feedback for online students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause problems.
- -Poor teaching quality and academic support are prevalent.
- -Lack of diversity and perceived favoritism are significant concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a major concern.
With an overall rating of 4, this institution demonstrates commendable strengths in **Internationality** (4.22) and **Student Life** (4.06), alongside solid scores for **Professors** and **Value**. Its **Accomodation** presents the area with the lowest score (3.71), suggesting potential for improvement in this aspect.
Remarkably high scores characterize this university's performance. Its location stands out with a perfect 5.0 rating, marking it as its strongest area. Areas such as facilities, professors, student life, and accommodation all received excellent scores of 4.33. Internationality and value were also strong, both earning 4.5. No significant weaknesses were identified, with all categories receiving positive feedback.
With a well-rounded performance, this university shines brightest in **Internationality** and **Professors**, both receiving scores above 4. Student life and value also present strong points. Conversely, **Accommodations** are the weakest area, scoring 3.25, while facilities also received a moderately lower rating.
Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** (4.45) and **Professors** (4.43), indicating a highly globalized and academically strong environment. The **Location** (4.39) and **Value** (4.32) also receive positive marks. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.70, suggesting this is the primary concern for students.
This university garners its highest marks for Internationality (4.05) and Location (4.02). Facilities also score well at 3.98. Conversely, Accomodation is the lowest rated area, receiving a 3.27. Student Life and Value share a 3.83 rating, while Professors are rated 3.88. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid, though not perfect, performance across these metrics.
This institution generally receives strong ratings across multiple aspects. Professors and location are particularly well-regarded, achieving scores near the top. Student life and internationality also score highly. While most areas are positive, facilities represent the weakest point among the surveyed categories, scoring notably lower than the other metrics.
This institution achieves outstanding scores in several key areas, notably Internationality (5.0) and Facilities and Student Life, both at an impressive 4.75. However, Accomodation presents a significant challenge, receiving the lowest rating at 2.25. Professors and Value also received solid, above-average scores.
With a 4/5 average rating from 19 reviews, students praise strong academics, particularly in STEM fields, and appreciate research focus and practical application. Positive feedback highlights well-prepared professors and diverse learning opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.
All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students highlight passionate professors, engaging classes, and exceptional education quality. There is no negative feedback.
~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning, international environment, and supportive professors. Negative feedback (~9.5%) mentions unorganized administration and issues with professor responsiveness.
~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility and online system. ~5% of reviews mention issues with grading delays and poor staff communication.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a good program range, helpful advisors, and a favorable fee structure. Around 18.6% are negative, citing unprofessionalism, lack of academic support, and poor management.
All 35 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.66/5. Students praise the international environment and interactive learning, noting personal development opportunities. No negative feedback was received.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~88% of feedback being 4-5 stars. Students praise hands-on learning, creative freedom, and access to professional-grade equipment. There is virtually no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
Well structured programs, great facilities and very good career development team. The alumni relations with the school are great and well maintained and fostered. Overall a great school right in the middle of Berlin.
Professors are supportive,and also guides students to better understanding of the concepts. But most of the time they are helping. There is also Case-Studies that helps us get better insights of real life cases.
My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.
My name is Ismail and I recommend BSBI for every student. They have really helped me throughout my online application process especially the Student Advisor Teja sree sikkem, in fact she is such a sweet person. Please contact her if you want to join BSBI, she is the best and guides you in each and every step in the admission process
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
I'm a Creative Audio Production & Sound Engineering graduate. My experience at Catalyst was generally positive. It had a culture of friendliness, kindness and helpfulness from the staff, professors and students. The classes are not the typical classes but are more so akin to workshops. You get introduced to a subject, technique or idea and you are very quickly thrown in the deep end to get your hands dirty in experimentation and practice, which I prefer. You get access to studios and a lot of fancy audio gear. One downside I experienced is the limited studio time. I loved working in the big studios but they increasingly over the years kept getting harder to book due to limited availability. What I found to be the most impactful experience was how challenging the projects were. There were no exams, fun fact. Instead of exams, we had big projects that spanned the entirety of each semester with hard milestone deadlines in between. Since these projects span the whole semester, you can begin to imagine the scale of work involved in completing them. The challenge in handling all the projects pushed me to achieve more than I could have imagined. I needed an environment like that. In conclusion, my time at Catalyst was great. Through all the hard work my skills increased exponentially in a short period of time. The staff and teachers are amazing and always ready to help.
