The Hague University of Applied Sciences - THUAS vs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs University of Twente vs Fontys University of Applied Sciences vs ONCAMPUS Global
Side-by-side comparison from 337 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality programs and engaging content
- +Excellent facilities and vibrant campus environment
- +Strong lecturers, supportive staff, and ample career opportunities
- +Strong theory-practice balance and real-world application
- +High-quality, challenging, and expert-led education
- +Diverse community and international opportunities
- +Diverse and multicultural learning environment.
- +Flexible, research-oriented, and hands-on academic programs.
- +Supportive community and innovative campus facilities.
- +Supportive and caring staff
- +Practical and international experience opportunities
- +Strong preparation for the job industry
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
- +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
- +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
- +Practical, project-based learning and real-world application
- +Welcoming atmosphere and supportive community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- -Lack of practical and relevant learning.
- -Poor course content and quality of education.
- -Disappointing and unmotivating academic experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Communication and course organization are often cited as lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support for students is a major concern.
- -Lack of perceived learning and skills development.
- -Poor quality of personnel and learning environment.
- -Administrative and management indifference to student concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of organization and poor management pervade all aspects of the institution.
- -Ineffective communication and a general lack of teacher availability and feedback leave students unsupported.
- -Unclear assignments and inconsistent assessment practices create confusion and frustration.
This university receives excellent marks in several key areas, most notably Internationality (4.59) and Location (4.49). Facilities also score highly at 4.43. Student Life and Professors are rated well, both at 4.11, with Value also matching this score. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.46.
This institution received its highest marks for Internationality, closely followed by Value and Professors. Student Life also scored well. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area, with Facilities also rating lower than other aspects. Location sits in the mid-range of these assessments.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Facilities**, which received the highest rating. Students also rated **Value** and **Location** highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest score, while **Professors** and **Student Life** also scored moderately lower compared to other aspects. The overall profile indicates a positive student experience with room for improvement in specific domains.
This institution scores remarkably well in several key areas. Facilities stand out with a rating of 4.31. Professors, location, internationality, and value also receive strong marks, all averaging around 4.12. Student life scores a respectable 3.69, while accommodation emerges as the lowest-rated category at 3.29.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.
Exceptional ratings were awarded to the university's **Facilities** (4.43) and **Internationality** (4.47). **Student Life** also scored well at 4.08 and **Value** at 3.98. The area requiring the most attention appears to be **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating at 3.65, with **Professors** also scoring moderately lower than other categories at 3.81.
~73% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent programs, facilities, and career opportunities. The environment and student life are also praised. A small ~3% of feedback expresses disappointment with a lack of practical learning in specific courses.
~88% of reviews are highly positive, praising the quality of education, practical application, and international environment. No negative feedback was received.
With 43 positive reviews out of 48, students praise academic and social benefits, enjoyable learning experiences, and multi-cultural environments. The average rating is 4.31/5.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive staff, good programs, and practical experience. A smaller portion, ~7.4%, expresses concerns about program structure, learning outcomes, and personnel quality.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning, ample opportunities, and a welcoming atmosphere. A small percentage of negative feedback cites disorganization and communication issues.
I will only talk about my major here, but in general, ICM is good with a broad career prospect. The teachers are always there to help us. They also handled the pandemic situation quite good. I chose THUAS and ICM because I could experience both a semester exchange and internship, unlike the other unis. For some reason student life after the pandemic is a lot better, with various fun activities and external events, maybe because we just stayed at home for a year or more:) The cons: understaffed, so we could see if the teachers are tired and sometimes affect us (and the time we get our grade). Overall, ICM at THUAS is 7/10
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
A good program to get to know different aspects of your study. Courses share an interaction with one main project in each quartile. Most teachers love their job and are interesting to listen to. The campus is set up really nicely, good to enjoy during breaks.
I like the possibility to self study, find materials and information, as well as the freedom of learning what I am interested in, while receiving feedback from my teachers which helps me getting on the right track.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Studying Creative Business at NHL Stenden has been a great experience with a few bumps down the road. Generally speaking, I'm very glad about my choice to study here - as an international student I am surrounded by other internationals which makes me feel more welcome and comfortable; this university has provided me with numerous extracurricular opportunities, which were not only great for networking and finding like-minded connections, but also getting extremely nice and useful experience, whether it's working on a real set with professional production equipment or creating content and representing my course on social media! When it comes to the study itself, it usually is pretty confusing, as students are usually just thrown into practical projects without initial preparation and sometimes not enough guidance. However, once you get used to design-based education, you realize how exciting the assignments actually are - working with real clients, producing your own ideas and seeing them come to life, and just "creativity, creativity, creativity" everywhere. I recommend this university for those who are not afraid of teamwork, thinking outside of the box, and being independent.
