University of Southern Denmark - SDU vs Creighton University vs St. Mary's University, San Antonio vs LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs University of Calabar
Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Project-based and practical learning
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Welcoming international environment
- +Career success and job readiness post-graduation
- +Strong alumni network and career support
- +Extensive student support
- +Strong marketing and business programmes
- +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
- +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
- +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
- +Engaging & effective teaching
- +Industry-ready practical knowledge
- +Diverse & supportive student community
- +Supportive community and friendly staff
- +Engaging learning environment and dedicated professors
- +Good facilities and affordable living
- +Excellent, updated curriculum and faculty.
- +Supportive learning environment and career support.
- +Strong infrastructure and technology access.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and responsiveness from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support leads to confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unhelpful staff cause frustration.
- -Limited course offerings and inflexible scheduling create barriers to learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and poor organization lead to confusion.
This institution's surveyed areas reveal a strong showing, particularly in **Internationality**, which received the highest rating. **Facilities** also garnered significant praise. Conversely, **Location** appears to be the weakest area, with a comparatively lower score. Other categories like Professors, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value received generally positive but more moderate ratings, indicating a solid overall experience with specific strengths.
This institution excels in several key areas, with perfect scores for **Location** and **Value**. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** also receive excellent marks. The university's weakest point is its **Internationality**, scoring a moderate 3. However, **Professors** are rated a respectable 3.5. Overall, it presents a strong offering with standout strengths.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodations. Value for money is also a significant strength, with a top rating. However, the university's weakest aspect is its Location, receiving a score of zero. Internationality is another area for improvement, scoring a moderate two.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.
Analysis of the university's ratings reveals a strong emphasis on its **location**, which received the highest score. Conversely, **accommodation** was rated the lowest. Professors and value for money also scored well, indicating positive academic and financial aspects. Student life and internationality received solid mid-range scores, while facilities were rated moderately.
This institution garners particularly high marks for its professors, reflecting a strong academic core. Student life and accommodation also receive positive feedback, indicating a supportive campus environment. While facilities and location are rated well, these areas represent the university's relative weakest points in the current assessment. Overall, the university demonstrates a commendable balance of strengths.
Academic strengths shine through, with professors receiving an excellent 4.5 rating and value for money also scoring highly at 4.5. Facilities and student life are solid at 3.5, while location and internationality are rated a respectable 3. The primary area for improvement lies with accommodation, which received the lowest score of 2.5.
Most students report a very positive experience (~86%), highlighting a welcoming international environment, modern facilities, and engaging project-based learning. A small minority (~5%) experienced issues with management and exam structures.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight successful career outcomes and consistent employment post-graduation. No negative feedback was received.
With one review received, the average rating is 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights strong student support. No negative reviews were submitted.
All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.
With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 71% of reviews are positive, highlighting engaging learning conditions, excellent lecturers, and enriching educational experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.
With ~87% positive feedback from 15 reviews, students highlight supportive staff, a conducive learning environment, and vibrant campus life. There is minimal negative feedback.
With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise excellent faculty, updated syllabi, and engaging learning environments, despite one mention of campus distance from the city. Management is noted as an area for improvement.
I was studying Engineering, Innovation & Business at the Sonderborg campus in the south of Denmark. The campus is a smaller one, but definitely one of the more beautiful ones. The building is placed right next to the water and inside you have the library with real trees and many opportunities to sit down and relax with friends on couches. The teachers are all very friendly and supportive. They know you by your name and their office is always open for you if you have any questions or need help (either academically, professionally or even personally). The student culture is great as well and you really get a sense of belonging to the community through the student bar, which is run voluntarily by the students and also through other student clubs and meetups. The difficulty of studying is fair. I would say it is a little bit easier compared to other European countries, but this also highly depends on the student. In general, however, I felt less pressure to study than in other universities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
