University of Novi Sad - UNS vs Riga style and fashion vocational school - RSMT vs University of Stuttgart vs Toronto School of Management vs Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul
Side-by-side comparison from 67 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse programs and specialization options
- +Practical skills and internship opportunities
- +Accessible professors and good facilities
Nothing to show
- +High quality of education and contemporary curriculum.
- +Commitment of professors and strong academic programs.
- +Diverse student body and international environment.
- +Industry-aligned courses and practical, hands-on learning
- +Partnerships with tech companies and real-world application
- +Excellent professors
- +Amazing campus infrastructure
Nothing to show
- +Flexible executive plan accommodates work and study
- +Supportive professors and coordinators
- -Outdated materials and faculty, coupled with a lack of practical application.
- -High tuition fees are a significant concern given the perceived value.
- -Limited career prospects in the field after graduation.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated system and ineffective career support.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant course material disappoints students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring complaint.
- -Lack of adequate support, both academic and personal, is a significant concern.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback, particularly excelling in Location and Student Life, both receiving scores close to 4.8. Professors and Value also received strong marks. However, areas for improvement are evident in Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories.
Nothing to show
This institution garners impressive scores in several key areas, with Internationality (4.225) and Location (4.1625) being particularly well-regarded. Student Life also receives a solid rating (4.125). Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.4625, while Facilities (3.9375) and Professors (3.9625) are rated competently. Value for money is also strong at 3.975.
Exceptional scores in multiple categories highlight this university's strengths. Professors, location, internationality, and value all received a perfect 5, indicating outstanding academic quality, accessibility, global outlook, and affordability. Facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well with 4s, suggesting a solid, well-rounded university experience. No areas received below average ratings.
This institution shines with perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, and accommodation, indicating exceptional strengths in these core areas. Student life and value are also positively rated at a solid 4. The weakest point lies in internationality, scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a robust offering, particularly excelling in its physical environment, academic staff, and prime setting.
Nothing to show
This institution shines in two key areas: receiving top marks for its professors and its value. Conversely, the university faces significant challenges, with facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all receiving the lowest possible ratings. Its internationality is a mid-range strength, scoring a respectable four out of five.
With an average rating of 4.24/5, ~74% of 54 reviews are positive, praising the beautiful campus, diverse programs, and student opportunities. A single negative review mentioned difficult faculty and outdated materials.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3.9/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% are positive, highlighting quality education and strong PhD programs, with many international students. ~10% of feedback is negative, citing bureaucracy and job prospects.
The sole review is highly positive (5/5 stars), praising the school's industry-aligned courses and practical training. There are no negative reviews.
The single review for UNISC is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. The feedback highlights excellent professors and amazing infrastructure. No negative reviews were received.
Nothing to show
The sole review is highly positive, with ~100% of feedback rating 5/5. Students highlight the flexibility of executive programs and supportive professors/coordinators. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I study architecture and this study is structured in a different way in most universities. What I like about the University of Stuttgart is that after obtaining the broad and diverse basics of the study in the first 2 years, you have the freedom to choose your own seminars and projects, concentrating on your point of interest. You can also distribute them as you wish. This is a huge adventure in a field where praxis in an office next to the studies is so important. An international semester is foreseen as well which helps you develop enormously in personal and cultural way.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
