University of Helsinki vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences vs Arcada University of Applied Sciences - UAS vs Laurea University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 60 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Top-tier research and teaching quality
- +Supportive and accessible teachers and staff
- +Balanced academic freedom with guidance and structure
- +Passionate and supportive educators
- +Practical, career-focused, and well-structured programs
- +International and friendly learning environment
- +Supportive environment and approachable staff
- +Practical, business-focused curriculum with real-world application
- +International community and diverse learning experiences
- +Practical, relevant learning and real-world projects
- +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
- +Modern facilities and updated resources
- +Supportive and available tutors
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Strong focus on job readiness and success
- +Personalized guidance and support for academic progress
- +Motivating and helpful staff
- +Opportunities for quick graduation
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a major drawback.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are a consistent complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unresponsive management create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff leads to confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant concern.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Inconsistent and unsupportive teaching staff create a negative academic experience.
Nothing to show
This institution receives outstanding marks for its **Facilities** (4.83) and **Student Life** (4.85). While **Location** (4.42), **Accomodation** (4.38), and **Internationality** (4.38) are strong, they represent the lower end of the provided ratings. Professors are well-regarded at 4.54, and value for money scores 4.46.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its academic offerings, with Professors receiving the highest rating. Its Facilities and Internationality are also highly regarded, alongside a strong showing for Value. Conversely, Accomodation is rated slightly lower than other aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, particularly in areas directly related to learning and global engagement.
Exceptional marks are awarded for its **location** (4.86) and **internationality** (4.75), showcasing significant strengths. **Facilities** also score highly at 4.38. Conversely, **professors** represent the weakest area with a rating of 3.63. **Student life** (3.86) and **accommodation** (3.88) are moderately rated, while **value** sits at a respectable 4.13.
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in its **Professors**, achieving a perfect score. Facilities and Value also receive exceptionally high marks. Conversely, Accomodation is the lowest-rated category. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, and Internationality are well-regarded, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This institution boasts exceptional internationality, earning a perfect score. Value is another significant strength, with a rating of 4.67. Professors and student life also received strong scores of 4. Areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, ratings include facilities, location, and accommodation, all at 3.67.
Exceptional scores were awarded across every aspect of the university. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received a perfect 5 out of 5. This indicates a uniformly excellent experience with no discernible weak areas, suggesting a consistently high-quality educational environment.
Nothing to show
University reviews are highly positive (~78%), praising high-quality teaching, research, and student independence. The city and supportive environment are also frequently highlighted.
With all 25 reviews being positive, students praise supportive and passionate teachers, practical and career-focused programs, and a rewarding academic experience. An average rating of 4.88/5 reflects this strong satisfaction.
With a 4.22/5 average, ~88% of reviews are positive, praising supportive staff, international programs, and practical business learning. Some students desire more social and extracurricular activities. No negative feedback was recorded.
All 100% of reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight a sense of belonging, welcoming staff, practical learning, and modern facilities. Some mention concern about course scheduling.
With an average rating of 4.33/5 based on 3 reviews, ~67% of feedback is positive. Students praise helpful tutors, real-world project opportunities, and a focus on creativity.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review highlights helpful staff, advice, opportunities, and motivational support. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Nothing to show
In all honesty, my university offers a fantastic level of education, dedicated and extensively knowledgeable lecturers, as well as a spacious, clean, modern campus. These items make it a great place to study. However, one specific trait that bothers me personally is that some of the more important courses are limited to a single period (half a semester), to make space for other courses that I deem unnecessary or that could be optional instead of mandatory. Overall, my experience at Arcada has been outstanding.
Nothing to show
This school was very good and helpful, I wanted to graduate quickly and they have helped me achieve this, they gave me advice and opportunities and they were checking in on my progress. Very motivating to be surrounded by the staff.
Nothing to show
