Odisee University of Applied Sciences vs Vrije Universiteit Brussel - VUB vs Vlerick Business School vs Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management vs Vesalius College Brussels - VeCo
Side-by-side comparison from 104 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Hands-on, real-world focused learning and projects
- +Strong preparation for business and professional life
- +Supportive and personal student-professor relationships
- +Engaging discussions through diversity and expert, passionate lecturers
- +Supportive learning environment with ample student interaction and academic development
- +Rich campus atmosphere and promising career prospects
- +Rigorous, well-structured programs with real-world application
- +Expert faculty deeply invested in student success
- +Strong industry connections and career focus
- +Strong economics and business programs
- +Supportive faculty and rigorous academics
- +Excellent networking and location
- +Accessible and supportive instructors
- +Engaging and well-structured courses
- +Strong career services and graduate support
- +Solid business & management foundation
- +International study & real-world experiences
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods leads to disinterest.
- -Discrimination and lack of support from university administration when addressing issues.
- -Poor quality of teaching and lectures, coupled with excessively difficult exams.
- -Lack of practical elements in the curriculum and insufficient individual student attention.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -They express frustration with outdated facilities and resources.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -administrative and management issues
- -lack of transparency and limited support
- -a disconnect between advertised quality and actual experience
- -Students dislike outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -They express frustration with administrative inefficiencies and lack of support.
- -Students find the curriculum inflexible and outdated.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This institution garners impressive scores in several key areas, particularly excelling in Internationality and Professor quality. Location also received a very high rating. Areas for improvement include Accomodation and Facilities, which scored lower in comparison to other categories. Student Life and Value also present moderately strong performances.
Emerging from the data, the university garners its highest marks in **Internationality** (4.38), suggesting a globally connected campus. Solid performance is also evident in **Facilities** (3.98), **Location** (3.96), and **Value** (3.96). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.62) and **Accomodation** (3.51) present areas for potential improvement. Overall, it showcases a good balance with a distinct international strength.
Boasting exceptional scores, the institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving perfect 5/5 ratings. **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also demonstrate strong performance with scores above 4.6. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest ratings at 3.67 and 3.33 respectively. Overall, the university presents a solid offering, particularly in its physical environment and academic/global engagement.
This institution garners exceptional marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and both accommodation and internationality also score highly with 4.5. The university's facilities are rated at a respectable 4, representing the lowest score among the evaluated aspects.
This university received uniformly average ratings of 1 across all evaluated categories. There are no standout strengths or weaknesses, indicating a consistent level of performance across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. The institution presents a balanced, albeit unremarkable, profile based on this assessment.
This university garners high marks for Internationality, its strongest area, with a rating of 4.39. Value is also a significant strength at 4.12. Professors are well-regarded with a score of 4.0. Areas for improvement include Facilities, rated at 3.33, and Location, which received the lowest score of 3.06. Student Life and Accomodation fall in the mid-range.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
All 13 reviews are positive, averaging 4.54/5 stars. Students praise the practical, real-world focus of courses and the helpful, personal relationships with professors.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising the green atmosphere, expert lecturers, and diverse environment. A small percentage (~8%) of negative feedback mentions issues with lecturer communication and exam difficulty.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the well-structured, interactive curriculum, expert faculty, and strong industry connections. Some wish for more career focus for MBA students.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive, highlighting strong academics and networking. Reviews commend knowledgeable faculty and rigorous coursework, though workload can be demanding.
Two reviews exist, both negative (1-2 stars) with an average rating of 1/5. Feedback highlights limited support, questionable transparency, and an internal culture needing improvement.
Approximately 100% of reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.09/5. Students highlight the program's demanding yet solid foundation, practical learning with real-life cases, and international opportunities like Erasmus. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
The university gives a hands on experience on learning and applying theory to action,We learn everything for the business world and we work on assignments through the whole academic year, we develop strategies, campaigns and everything you need to know for the business world
I really like the lush and green atomosphere surrounding the campus on Etterbeek. There is generally always a vivid and positive vibe on the campus. From all the campuses I have been, this one has the most greenery. A small downside however is that some aula's look a bit dated from the inside, yet this isn't much of an issue when it comes to my learning experiences.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
