Sapienza – Università di Roma vs Rome Business School vs Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta - LUMSA vs Guglielmo Marconi University vs European School of Economics - ESE
Side-by-side comparison from 250 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and supportive professors
- +Well-structured and relevant programs with real-world application
- +Positive overall learning experience and growth opportunities
- +Practical, real-world application of theory
- +High-quality faculty with professional experience
- +Engaging and inspiring learning experiences
- +Approachable, supportive professors and a positive learning environment.
- +Opportunities for international experiences and active student involvement.
- +Well-structured courses and encouragement for personal and professional growth.
- +Relevant and in-depth subject matter
- +Competent and knowledgeable professors
- +Convenient telematics access
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- +Structured learning and international community
- +Positive location and good opportunities
- +Practice-oriented approach and practical application of skills
- +International perspective and understanding of the industry
- +Teachers as current specialists
- -Outdated facilities and chaotic campus environment.
- -Poor career preparation and unhelpful staff.
- -Significant administrative and organizational issues.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unprofessionalism and corruption.
- -Lack of promised resources and outdated/inadequate course content.
- -Difficulty reaching staff and unresolved technical/system issues.
- -Disorganized administration and unclear communication.
- -Lack of modern facilities and outdated resources.
- -Inconsistent or ineffective teaching and support.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant concern.
- -Inflexible and poorly communicated academic policies frustrate students.
- -Limited career services and support hinder post-graduation prospects.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Lack of effective communication
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Students often complain about administrative inefficiency and poor communication.
- -Course content is frequently perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in **Location**, achieving a high rating of 4.22. **Professors** and **Value** also received strong scores above 4.0. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area with the lowest rating of 3.34. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate range, suggesting room for improvement in specific student services.
A generally positive university review highlights exceptional strength in **Internationality**, scoring a near-perfect 4.8. **Location** also stands out with a high rating of 4.6. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score, at 3.94, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other categories like Professors, Student Life, and Value also garnered strong marks above 4.
This institution receives excellent marks for its Location and Value, both scoring above 4.6. Professors and Facilities are also highly regarded, with ratings of 4.46. Areas needing improvement include Student Life and Accommodation, which stand at 3.77 and 3.75 respectively. Internationality is rated moderately well at 4.15.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings, with high ratings for Professors and Value. Conversely, several core areas require substantial improvement. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation all received zero ratings, indicating considerable deficiencies. Internationality presents a moderate but still underdeveloped aspect, with a rating of two.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
With exceptional scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality, the university demonstrates considerable strengths. Student Life and Value also receive positive feedback, indicating a generally well-rounded experience. The primary area for improvement lies in Accomodation, which received the lowest rating.
With outstanding scores in several key areas, this institution shines in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student life is also highly regarded, scoring a 4. Accommodations are rated a 3, representing a moderate aspect. The university's weakest area by a significant margin is **Facilities**, which received a score of 0. Overall, the value proposition is excellent, also rated a 5.
Most reviews are positive (~74%), highlighting excellent professors and rewarding academic experiences. A small percentage (~4.8%) express dissatisfaction with organization and preparation for work.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~94%), praising practical learning and experienced faculty. A small percentage (~6%) of feedback highlights issues with diploma delivery, administrative support, and perceived unprofessionalism.
With an average rating of 4.54/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise approachable professors, modern facilities, and a supportive, dynamic learning environment with many student initiatives and international opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.
With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Students highlight well-suited second-year subjects, particularly in marketing and computer science, taught by competent professors.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Based on one review, the university receives a 4/5 rating. The program is praised for its structure and international community, though some opportunities may be less accessible than presented.
With a single review, the university has a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights a strong professional stage, theoretical and practical understanding of the industry, and a practice-oriented approach with current specialists.
I studied at the Sapienza University of Rome. I think it is one of the best Italian universities, among its strong points we have: prestigious professors and a super active student community. the negative point is that there are many students and sometimes they are difficult to follow everyone. Beyond this I recommend the university. I studied in the economics faculty and I must say that it is really well organised. there are numerous study rooms, laboratories and there is a canteen which allows students to eat good food for a few euros. Sapienza is today a point of reference in the Italian community for capable young graduates!
Enrolling in the International Master in Project Management has been an incredible milestone for my professional development. The curriculum perfectly balances core theoretical methodologies with practical, real-world case studies, making every concept immediately applicable to real workplace scenarios. Beyond the quality of the coursework, what truly sets this program apart is the level of mentorship. I am deeply grateful to Gianmarco and the entire academic team for their hands-on support, responsiveness, and continuous guidance throughout the journey. I highly recommend this master’s program to any professional looking to refine their strategic mindset, sharpen their leadership capabilities, and elevate their career in project management.
I think it is one of the best Italian universities in terms of work, availability, professionalism and hospitality are at the highest levels, and it offers various study paths structured in an optimal way. I recommend it to anyone who wants to take a university course.
Nothing to show
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
