Aalborg University - AAU vs Aarhus University - AU vs Roskilde University - RUC vs Technical University of Denmark - DTU vs VIA University College - VIA
Side-by-side comparison from 267 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and enthusiastic teachers
- +Inclusive and welcoming environment
- +Research opportunities and guidance
- +Approachable and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Supportive learning environment and community
- +Convenient location and urban setting
- +Project-based learning with real-life problems
- +Supportive and helpful teachers
- +International and diverse student atmosphere
- +Interactive and practical learning with helpful lecturers
- +Supportive and inclusive community with diverse student life
- +International environment and a wide course selection
- +Practical, real-world focused education
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Organized learning environment and resources
Nothing to show
- +Approachable and helpful professors
- +Practical, applicable course structure
- +Vibrant student life
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Inefficient administrative and management systems cause significant frustration.
- -A lack of necessary resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The academic environment and faculty engagement are disappointing.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and a lack of clear communication cause frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary obstacles.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently mentioned.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues, including inconsistent teaching quality and lack of student attention.
- -Outdated facilities and course material requiring reorganization.
- -Lack of feedback on exams and unclear grading policies.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are significant concerns.
Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates a solid overall performance. Its highest-rated categories include Professors (4.33) and Facilities (4.31), indicating strengths in these core academic and infrastructural aspects. While still favorable, Accommodation (4.10) received the lowest score among the surveyed areas, suggesting it could be an area for further development. The university also received strong marks for Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all falling between 4.18 and 4.28.
Overall, this institution receives positive evaluations across multiple aspects. The strongest areas are its **Professors** (4.30) and **Facilities** (4.22), indicating excellent academic and resource provisions. **Location** (4.14) and **Value** (4.18) are also highly rated. **Student Life** (3.85) emerges as the comparatively weakest area, though still a respectable score, with **Accomodation** (3.94) and **Internationality** (4.03) performing moderately well.
A generally positive assessment emerges from these university ratings. The institution excels in areas like **Internationality** and **Value**, both scoring an impressive 4.75. **Professors** also receive a perfect score of 5. The primary area for improvement lies with **Accomodation**, which is rated a comparatively lower 3.5, though still within a good range. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are also strong points, rated 4.5.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its **Facilities** and **Value**, both scoring a near-perfect 4.72. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also stand out with strong ratings around 4.4. **Professors** are well-regarded at 4.5. **Accomodation** fares decently at 4.06. The **Location** is the weakest area, receiving the lowest score of 3.81.
Exhibiting exceptional strengths in Internationality (4.92) and Facilities (4.88), this institution receives very high marks in these areas. Professors are also well-regarded at 4.44. Conversely, Student Life (3.84) and Location (3.9) represent the weaker aspects of the university experience, though accommodations (3.86) are only slightly above this. Value is rated a solid 4.24.
Nothing to show
This institution receives exceptional ratings for its **Facilities**, scoring a high 4.75. **Student Life** and **Value** are also strong points, both earning a respectable 4. While **Accomodation** and **Location** are decent, the university's **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, receiving the lowest score of 2.75. **Professors** are rated moderately well.
With a ~100% positive sentiment from 42 reviews, students highlight dedicated teachers, engaging courses, and excellent research opportunities. The university is praised for its inclusive and welcoming environment for international students.
~99% of reviews are positive, highlighting flexible classes, urban settings, and approachable, knowledgeable lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback exists, with approximately 1% expressing regret about their experience.
With a ~70% positive sentiment, students praise project-based learning, supportive teachers, and the international atmosphere. Some mention a need for independence and time management. No negative reviews were recorded.
All 20 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.45/5. Students praise the interactive learning, supportive atmosphere, and diverse international community. They also highlight engaging subjects and good student life opportunities.
With a 4.08 average rating from 119 reviews, ~74% are positive, praising organized schedules, helpful teachers, and practical learning. Negative feedback is minimal (~4.2%) and briefly mentions program variability and limited student attention.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights professors' willingness to help and well-structured courses. Student life is also noted as amazing. No negative reviews were recorded.
I studied my master degree at Aalborg University from 2008-2010. It was the first time my master degree was offered and as always; a new education can struggle to find its feet. So it was very broad topics with the notice; that you could become anything you liked. I had to find my own path in this, but I like the fact that you are able to impact and create your own expertise within a broad field through the semester Projects and problem-based learning. It wasn't as hard as I had imagined (coming from a different type of education). I liked the freedom and requirement of independence that the program offered. I had a good experience; I know that program I studied have developed a lot since then and I think it has been for the better; some of the structure and topics we lacked are now a part of the program.
The MSc in Finance programme is one of the toughest of the Business School, therefore, it is a high level programme due to the level of the admitted students and the work required. However, I think the course is way too academic-focused (theoretical rather than practical). I like the competitiveness of the programme and of the students. I would definitely recommend it to a European friend (it is free tuition for EU citizens) but perhaps not for a non-European friend. The campus is small and rather old, but good enough to do all student-related tasks. The night life in Aarhus can be quite nice, it is a very young city where 15% of the city are students or young adults. I think the Career Services could play a bigger role and have more on campus recruiting as Aarhus is a leading university in Denmark.
Nothing to show
Forget stuffy lectures and textbook-only learning! At DTU, you're thrown headfirst into real-world challenges. Professors are industry veterans, not just academics, and they bring their practical experience into the classroom. You'll be building prototypes, collaborating on projects with companies, and even testing your ideas in the field. By the time you graduate, you won't just have a degree, you'll have a portfolio of real-world experience that makes the transition from student to professional seamless.
I believe VIA UC gives really good opportunities to develop within a specific field. I can talk from my experience being a Marketing Management student. The study model is comprehensive with internship possibilities to gain practical knowledge about the subject. I enjoy learning environment as well as lecturers, who can be successful entrepreneurs/experts in their field. The focus is based on group work as well as problem-solving cases. Campus Horsens offers a wide range of places to study, library, gym, and several organisations as AIESEC or student council DSR, that offer extracurricular opportunities. The attached Vitus Bering Innovation Park gives an insight into a business environment which encourages students to participate in innovative challenges or offers support with developing own businesses.
Nothing to show
First of all, the university is nowhere near as international as it portrays itself to be; there are less international students than you would expect. In terms of the teachers, I can honestly say I had one good teacher per semester. The others ranged from bad to completely unprofessional. Also with the planning of exams and classes, it sometimes made me wonder how the people behind this can be a part of the management department. However, on the bright side, I did like the idea of working in study groups and having to do all sorts of projects - that helps with the practical aspects of teaching. Another thing that I'd praise is the cafeteria, as they offer fresh and diverse food.
