emlyon business school vs Free University of Berlin - FU vs International School of Management vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University vs OP Jindal Global University - JGU
Side-by-side comparison from 452 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +High academic quality and supportive professors
- +International environment and student diversity
- +No tuition fees making education accessible
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Supportive and experienced faculty
- +Practical learning and updated curriculum
- +Welcoming environment and extracurricular opportunities
- +Practical, real-world focus and curriculum
- +Supportive faculty and positive learning environment
- +Good career prospects and specialized programs
- +Supportive faculty and clear explanations
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse exposure
- +Strong academic standards and good ROI
- +Relevant, industry-oriented, and practical curricula
- +Supportive faculty and interactive learning environment
- +Vibrant campus life with frequent, engaging events
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Outdated curriculum and lack of current market relevance
- -Poor career services and job placement support
- -Inadequate facilities and resources
- -High fees and perceived lack of value for money.
- -Poor quality of accommodation and food.
- -Institutional focus on finances over student welfare and study quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are perceived as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often criticized as inadequate.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in **Internationality**, earning a high rating. Its **Professors** and **Student Life** also receive positive marks, as does the **Value** proposition. **Facilities** are rated well, though **Location** is only at a moderate level. The area with the lowest rating is **Accomodation**.
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
Assessments reveal a university performing well in several key areas. Its location and professors are particularly strong, both receiving ratings above 4.0. Student life and value also show solid scores. However, internationality stands out as the weakest aspect, with a significantly lower rating. Facilities and accommodation also received moderate scores, indicating room for improvement.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **accommodations**, achieving a near-perfect score. Facilities also received a high rating. Conversely, the **location** was the least positively reviewed aspect. Student life, internationality, and value represent solid middle-ground strengths, with professors also scoring favorably.
This university scores exceptionally well in **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving ratings near 4.7. **Professors** also earned a high mark at 4.55. Areas requiring development include **Facilities** and **Accomodation**, along with **Internationality**, all rated around 3.45. **Value** sits comfortably in the upper tier with a 4.64.
Overall, this institution garners positive feedback, with its strongest performance in **Professors** (4.57), closely followed by **Value** (4.51) and **Accomodation** (4.48). **Facilities** (4.40) and **Student Life** (4.40) also receive high marks. The area receiving the lowest rating is **Internationality** (4.17), though it remains a respectable score.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews rating it 4–5 stars. Students praise its strong academic reputation, international environment, supportive professors, and good infrastructure, while noting minor issues with course selection.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
Most reviews are positive (~67%), praising structured curriculum, supportive and experienced faculty, and practical learning. A small portion (~6%) express concern over outdated teaching methods and limited placement support.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning, well-structured programs, and helpful faculty. A small portion, ~12%, expressed concerns about cost and facilities.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.45/5. Students praise clear teaching, good syllabus coverage, positive campus vibe, and opportunities for growth. A few mention slow facilities or admin work.
With ~99% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.69/5, students praise relevant, industry-oriented curricula and strong faculty support. They highlight a vibrant campus life with numerous events and holistic development opportunities. Minimal negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
Free University of Berlin is a great educational institution for international students. It gives you a great opportunity to learn how to work with an international teams in fields of the sociological research.
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
As a second-year student at IILM University in Greater Noida, here's my experience so far: Positive Aspects: 1. **Infrastructure**: The university offers modern facilities, including well-equipped classrooms, a spacious library, and other amenities that create a good learning environment. 2. **Faculty**: The professors are knowledgeable and bring a lot of industry experience to the table. Many of them are approachable and willing to support us in both academics and personal growth. 3. **Industry Exposure**: I’ve had the opportunity to participate in various workshops, guest lectures, and internships, which have helped me gain practical insights into my field of study. 4. **Campus Life**: The campus is vibrant, with a variety of extracurricular activities like sports, cultural events, and student clubs. It’s been a great way to balance academics with personal interests. 5. **Location**: Being located in Greater Noida, it’s easy to travel to and from Delhi. The area is also growing in terms of educational and industrial opportunities, which is an added advantage. ### Areas of Concern: 1. **Fee Structure**: The fees are on the higher side compared to some other universities, which can be a bit of a challenge for some students. 2. **Placement**: While the placement cell does its best, I’ve heard mixed reviews regarding the placements for some specialized programs. Management courses tend to have better placement outcomes, but it's something I’m still keeping an eye on. 3. **Facilities**: Though the infrastructure is good, I think there’s room for improvement in areas like hostel maintenance. Sometimes, the upkeep of certain facilities could be better. 4. **Reputation**: While the university’s reputation is improving, it doesn’t yet have the same level of recognition as some of the more established universities, which is something to consider when thinking about long-term prospects. Overall, my experience at IILM has been positive. The academic and campus life are fulfilling, and I’m gaining valuable exposure to the industry. However, I do hope to see improvements in placements and the fee structure as I move forward in my studies.
