emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Nanjing University - NJU vs Nanjing University of Finance and Economics vs Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
Side-by-side comparison from 198 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +Strong academic programmes with practical application
- +Excellent opportunities for skill development and networking
- +Valuable international exposure and alumni support
- +Excellent campus facilities and environment.
- +High teaching quality and strong academic reputation.
- +Diverse community and quality student accommodation.
Nothing to show
- +Accessible and supportive faculty
- +Engaging and practical curriculum
- +Strong career services and networking opportunities
- +Comfortable campus, good facilities, flexible curriculum
- +Skilled and experienced lecturers
- +Diverse programs and international community
- +Pleasant campus environment and events
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and disorganization.
- -Teaching faculty and their perceived focus on profit over education are criticized.
- -Guidance for career goals and clarity on doubts are lacking.
- -Lack of action regarding animal abuse by students.
- -Ethical concerns about the institution's values.
Nothing to show
- -Difficulty with instruction in Chinese
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
- -Administrative issues and lack of effective management create frustration.
- -Communication problems and unresponsiveness from staff are a recurring issue.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Students find outdated facilities frustrating.
- -Students are unhappy with a lack of resources and support.
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors** (4.41), **Internationality** (4.36), and **Location** (4.25). **Facilities** (4.21) and **Student Life** (4.11) also receive favorable scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 3.58, while **Value** sits at 4.04.
The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest area. The **facilities** and **accommodation** also receive favorable ratings. Conversely, **internationality** is the lowest-rated aspect, with **professors** and **student life** receiving moderately lower scores than the university's stronger points. The **value** proposition is also rated well.
Nothing to show
This institution excels significantly in its internationality, receiving a perfect score. Accommodation and location are also strong points, both earning four out of five. Conversely, the university's facilities are its weakest area, rated at a zero. Value for money is also a concern, with a score of two. Professor quality and student life are mid-range, each scoring three.
The university demonstrates exceptionally strong performance in several key areas. Facilities and location both received a perfect score of 5. Other aspects such as Professors, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also highly rated, averaging approximately 4.67. This indicates a well-rounded positive experience for students.
Exceptional marks were awarded across all surveyed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received perfect scores of five. This indicates a uniformly outstanding university experience where no single area significantly outshines others, nor are there any weaker points to note based on these ratings.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
Over 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting student associations, international opportunities, and practical skills for careers. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and course organization.
With a 3.29 average rating, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good facilities, teaching quality, and campus reputation. Negative feedback (~28.6%) expresses concern regarding animal welfare.
Nothing to show
The single review provided is negative, rating the university at 2/5. The primary concern highlighted is the difficulty of Chinese studies, despite positive remarks about the school environment.
With an average rating of 4.67/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise comfortable campuses, complete facilities, flexible curriculum, skilled lecturers, and a conducive environment for learning and self-development, including for international students.
This university receives a highly positive reception, with 100% of feedback being favorable. Students highlight a comfortable campus environment and engaging events like the February Orchid viewing Festival. The average rating is 4 out of 5 stars.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
As a person who is in higher education, I would never ever enroll in a school that allows and condemns a person, a psychopath, who abuses and torture animals, to enroll and study there. Shame on this school and shame on China. I would recommend to considering going to a school that values life; especially of the vulnerable and voiceless (animals)! Enroll in a school that uses their voice and does something to protect the vulnerable. Skip this school that stays quiet about an animal torturer and allows them to enroll.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Hohai University is a research institution, aimed at solving problems in the environment. It offers varied programs : water and hydrology, environmental science, materials science, computer science, MBA etc. It provides conducive environment for international students.
Nothing to show
