emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Chengdu University of Information and Technology - CUIT vs Chengdu University of Technology - CDUT vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 259 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
- +Engaging and accessible teaching styles.
- +Supportive and helpful faculty and staff.
- +Vibrant student community and extracurriculars.
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs with international focus and practical experience.
- +Approachable and supportive teachers fostering a positive learning environment.
- +Vibrant campus life and opportunities for personal and professional growth.
- +Strong student welfare and support
- +Excellent academic programs and research facilities
- +Diverse and engaging campus activities
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
- -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
- -Teachers are boring and teaching methods are unengaging.
- -The curriculum often feels outdated.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
Nothing to show
- -Ineffective and unprepared professors with poor language skills.
- -Poor organization and irrelevant, expensive courses.
- -Lack of student engagement and focus on partying.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.
Across all surveyed categories, the university received a neutral rating of 0. This indicates that no single area stands out as particularly strong or weak in the current assessment. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value were all rated equally, suggesting an average or unremarkable performance in each domain.
Nothing to show
Evaluations reveal a university with particularly strong offerings in **location** and **student life**, both exceeding a 4.1 rating. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 3.41. Other aspects like professors, facilities, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-to-high range, generally between 3.75 and 3.94.
This university demonstrates a consistently strong performance across various aspects. Its facilities are rated exceptionally high, receiving a perfect score of 5. Among other well-regarded areas are accommodation and value, both exceeding 4.4. Location and internationality also scored favorably at 4.28. Student life is a solid 4.14. The weakest area, though still positive, is its professors, rated at 4.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
The single review is negative (1-2 stars), giving an average rating of 2/5. This feedback, representing ~100% of reviews, highlights boring teachers and a lack of engaging instruction.
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, approachable teachers, and good knowledge transfer. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~86%), highlighting student welfare, supportive staff and supervisors, and diverse activities. Facilities like labs and libraries are praised, as is the good international environment with no discrimination.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Nothing to show
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
