emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Audencia Business School vs ESSCA School of Management vs EMLV Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 233 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +International focus and diverse campus experiences
- +Practical, industry-relevant curriculum and career support
- +Strong community with great classmates and alumni network
- +Excellent professors, classes, and facilities.
- +Diverse international student community and cultural immersion.
- +Well-structured programs and ample opportunities for professional development and city exploration.
- +Practical teaching, real-life cases, and experiential learning
- +International environment and diverse programs with exchange opportunities
- +Supportive staff and high-quality teaching and content
- +Career-focused programs and practical learning opportunities
- +Diverse and inclusive multicultural environment
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues create poor student experience.
- -Ineffective communication and guidance hinder career development.
- -Faculty and program organization are disappointing and overly focused on profit.
- -Lack of practical training and outdated facilities.
- -Unresponsive professors and poor management.
- -Irrelevant courses and unqualified teachers lead to dissatisfaction.
- -High cost is not justified by the quality of education offered.
- -Administrative and management issues negatively impact student experiences.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
- -Poor curriculum design and delivery lead to student dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
Across a range of metrics, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **professors** (4.41) and **internationality** (4.36). Facilities and location also received favorable scores, both above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating a generally positive experience. The weakest area is **accommodation**, which stands at 3.56, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
Regarding its overall assessment, the institution performs best in **Internationality** (4.29) and **Value** (4.16). Professors also receive a high mark (4.03). The weakest area identified is **Accomodation** (3.47), though Facilities also scored relatively lower (3.85). Student Life and Location received solid ratings in the mid-range.
This institution performs best in Student Life, receiving a strong rating of 4.18. Professors, Location, and Internationality also received excellent marks around 4.09. The weakest area for the university is Accomodation, scoring 3.27. Facilities and Value are rated moderately well, with scores of 3.64 and 3.82 respectively.
With excellent marks in several key areas, this institution shines particularly brightly in its facilities, earning a near-perfect score. The location also receives very high praise. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest-rated aspect, while student life, internationality, and value for money are rated moderately. Professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores compared to the top categories.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
The vast majority (~97%) of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and strong alumni networks. A small percentage (~3%) express concerns about management, communication, and organization.
With an average rating of 4.19/5, roughly 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent classes, professors, and facilities. One negative review expressed disappointment with a lack of practical training and professor engagement.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical teaching, international focus, and supportive staff. One review (around 9%) criticizes course relevance and instructor quality.
University reviews are largely positive (~89%), highlighting career-oriented programs, modern facilities, and a multicultural environment. A small portion of feedback (~11%) mentions poor administration and management of specific programs.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
We were promised good internship programs, however we are left to fend for ourselves where we have to find everything on our own with little to no guidance from the bigger authorities. A little disappointing
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
Nothing to show
