emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Audencia Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs ESIEE Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 254 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Practical, skill-building programs with industry relevance
- +Supportive and interactive faculty and staff
- +Rich extracurricular activities and networking opportunities
- +Supportive learning environment with good teachers and diverse international community.
- +Excellent facilities and well-designed courses catering to professionals.
- +Ideal student city with good amenities and student-friendly scheduling.
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Strong partnerships and practical skills development.
- +International diversity and supportive community.
- +Versatile, English-taught programs with professional instructors.
- +Supportive and inclusive learning environment
- +Practical and applied learning methods
- +Vibrant student life and international opportunities
- +Strong career advancement and market-relevant skills.
- +High-quality faculty and engaging curriculum.
- +Welcoming community and supportive staff.
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative & management issues, including poor communication and exam/result mismanagement.
- -Concerns about financial focus over student well-being and discrimination.
- -Unorganized programs and overwhelming course loads with varied evaluations.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of practical tool training.
- -Unsupportive professors who dismiss constructive criticism.
- -Limited opportunities for student interaction and networking.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsive administration cause frustration.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance disappoint students.
- -Unprepared and unhelpful professors.
- -Irrelevant courses and outdated curriculum.
- -Poor organization and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are prevalent.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
This university garners strong ratings across several key areas, with **Professors** and **Internationality** standing out as exceptional strengths. Students also appreciate the **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life**. The **Value** offering is also well-regarded. The **Accomodation** category received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas, with Internationality standing out as its strongest point. Professors and Value also received commendations. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation, which presents as the weakest rated aspect, followed by Facilities. Student Life and Location are rated well, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
This institution boasts a consistently high level of performance across most surveyed areas. Its strongest aspects lie in internationality and value, both scoring an excellent 4.5. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation all receive a solid 4, indicating a well-rounded and positive university experience. No significantly weak areas were identified within these ratings.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **location**, scoring an impressive 4.33, and in **student life** at 4.24. Ratings for professors and internationality are also solid. The weakest area appears to be **accommodation**, receiving a score of 3.5. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with room for improvement in specific aspects.
This university garners exceptional scores in academic and social aspects, with Professors receiving a near-perfect 4.8 and Internationality a strong 4.6. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded at 4.33. Location and Value are solid at 4.5 and 4 respectively. However, Accomodation stands out as a weaker area, scoring a significantly lower 3.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
Around 97.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical skills, career development, and enriching international experiences. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions program disorganization and communication issues.
University reviews are highly positive (~94%), highlighting a great learning environment, good facilities, and an international student community. A small portion (~6%) expressed disappointment with practical training and professor availability.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Both reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4/5 stars. Students highlight strong partnerships with businesses and a welcoming international community. The program is described as versatile and taught in English.
With a 3.91/5 average, ~74% of 22 reviews are positive, praising helpful staff, enjoyable campus life, and practical teaching. Two negative reviews (9.1%) cited unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
With 100% positive sentiment, student reviews highlight strong career advancement and valuable skills gained. Frequent themes include high-quality courses, competent professors, and practical relevance. Some students desired stronger post-graduation support and a more engaged alumni network.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Nothing to show
