emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs NEOMA Business School vs Audencia Business School vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 347 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Practical, career-focused programs with industry relevance
- +Supportive faculty and international student environment
- +Opportunities for hands-on experience and personal development
- +Strong student connections and professionalizing opportunities
- +Enriching international curriculum and diverse courses
- +Valuable professional experiences and solid foundation in core subjects
- +High-quality faculty and well-designed academic programs
- +Diverse international student community and networking opportunities
- +Excellent facilities and desirable city location for students
- +Practical curriculum and quality teaching
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Career preparation and alumni network
- +High-quality education with specialization options and practical experience
- +Vibrant campus life and strong community with supportive peers and professors
- +Excellent career preparation through industry connections and internships
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder student experience.
- -Poor communication and guidance are significant concerns for students.
- -Teaching faculty needs improvement and a less business-focused approach.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is frequently mentioned.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of practical training.
- -Unresponsive and critical professors.
- -Limited opportunities for student interaction and networking.
- -Superficial course content and lack of practical application
- -Unprofessional training and limited career support relative to cost
- -Mismatch between program offerings and student expectations
- -Unprepared and unhelpful professors with poor English communication.
- -Poor organization and irrelevant, expensive courses.
- -Lack of student engagement and focus on partying.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback across most aspects. Professors and internationality stand out as its strongest points, receiving particularly high scores. Student life and facilities also rate well. However, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other categories. The university offers a generally good value for its students.
Performance across surveyed categories reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The university excels in Internationality and Value, both scoring 4.21. Student Life also garners a high rating of 4.19. The lowest-rated aspect is Facilities, receiving a score of 3.85, though this is still a respectable mark. Professors and Location are also rated favorably, around the 3.8-3.9 range, as is Accomodation.
An overview of the university's ratings reveals several strengths. Notably, Internationality stands out with the highest score, indicating a particularly welcoming and diverse environment. Professors and Value also received high marks, suggesting strong academic instruction and a good return on investment. On the other hand, Accomodation received the lowest rating, pointing to a potential area for improvement. Facilities and Student Life also scored moderately.
Analyzing the provided ratings, the university excels particularly in **Internationality** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.25. **Location** also receives a strong endorsement. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.57. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a respectable mid-range, generally hovering around the 4.0 mark.
Among the evaluated aspects, the university excels in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.32, and **Student Life**, with a score of 4.22. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.46. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value are all rated favorably, generally falling between 3.8 and 3.96, indicating a well-rounded experience with room for improvement in housing.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
Most reviews are positive (~97.3%), praising practical, career-focused courses and knowledgeable instructors. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions program disorganization and communication issues.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~74% giving 4–5 stars. Students highlight exceptional environments, enriching international components, and valuable professionalizing opportunities. Some note interesting courses with a heavy assignment load, and a few mention teachers lacking teaching experience. No 1-2 star reviews were recorded.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 95% of reviews are positive. Students praise the learning environment, good installations, and the city. A small percentage of feedback (~5%) mentions disappointment with theoretical classes and professor availability.
~89% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical curriculum, good teaching, and international environments. A small minority (~5%) found courses superficial or lacking practical value.
Most reviews (~74%) praise the quality of education, practical experience, and vibrant campus life. A small percentage (8.3%) mention unprepared professors and organizational issues.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
