emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs NEOMA Business School vs Audencia Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 394 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: IDRAC Business School (4.80)
emlyon business school: wins 2/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
EDHEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
NEOMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Audencia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Excelia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
IDRAC Business School: wins 5/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Master in Management
La Rochelle, France
4.10
Read more reviews
64 reviews
×
Best programme: Master of Science (MSc)
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: MBA IT Business Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.15
4.23
4.33
3.86
4.00
4.00
4.75
Win
Location
4.60
Win
4.33
3.85
3.91
4.06
4.31
4.50
Professors
4.06
4.38
4.32
3.97
4.10
3.94
4.75
Win
Internationality
4.60
Win
4.42
4.45
4.22
4.40
4.31
4.50
Student life
4.25
4.25
4.22
4.21
4.00
4.26
4.75
Win
Value
4.43
4.09
4.06
4.19
4.10
3.92
4.75
Win
Accommodation
3.94
3.68
3.28
3.91
3.58
3.64
4.75
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical and international programs with diverse students
  • +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
  • +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
  • +Diverse international campus options and multicultural exposure
  • +Comprehensive and customizable curricula for academic and professional growth
  • +Strong faculty expertise and ample career development opportunities
  • +Outstanding teaching quality and practical, employer-aligned courses
  • +Strong corporate network and valuable career services
  • +Rigorous academics with practical industry insights
  • +Flexible, international curriculum shaping studies.
  • +Strong networking and community through associations and alumni.
  • +Engaging and professional teaching with diverse student body.
  • +Excellent teachers and diverse international community
  • +Great facilities and well-structured classes
  • +Supportive learning environment and city amenities
  • +Diverse, multicultural environment and international opportunities.
  • +High-quality teaching from experienced professors and speakers.
  • +Practical curriculum and good infrastructure for student needs.
  • +Strong academic support and faculty availability
  • +Practical, real-world business focus and company connections
  • +Emphasis on international perspective and personal/professional development
Cons
  • -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
  • -Administrative and management issues negatively impact student experience and support.
  • -Poor communication and guidance from faculty hinder career aspirations.
  • -Program disorganization and overwhelming course load create confusion and stress.
  • -High tuition fees and perceived poor value for money are a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is prevalent.
  • -Limited practical training and theory-heavy courses.
  • -Unresponsive professors and resistance to feedback.
  • -Lack of student interaction and networking opportunities.
  • -Superficial course content and lack of practical value
  • -Unprofessional training and limited internship/apprenticeship support
  • -Business-focused curriculum not aligning with student marketing interests
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent complaint.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are major dissatisfactions.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.

Emerging from the data, this institution shines particularly bright in **Internationality**, scoring an impressive 4.42. Professors and Location also receive very high marks, both above 4.3. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.68, indicating potential for improvement in this aspect of student experience. Other categories, including Facilities, Student Life, and Value, are all rated positively.

The university excels in Internationality with a rating of 4.45, closely followed by its Professors at 4.32 and Facilities at 4.23. Student Life and Value also receive positive marks. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.21, with Location also being a moderate concern at 3.77. Overall, the institution demonstrates strengths in its academic and global offerings, while areas concerning student living arrangements and campus surroundings could see improvement.

Examining the provided university ratings reveals a strong showing in several key areas. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated category, closely followed by Student Life and Value, indicating significant strengths in these aspects. Facilities represent the lowest-scoring area, suggesting room for improvement compared to other metrics. The remaining categories, Professors, Location, and Accomodation, fall within a relatively narrow and positive range.

This university garners strong marks for its **Internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4.385. Professors and Value also score well at 4.125. Areas like Facilities and Student Life are generally positive, hovering around 4.0. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.579, indicating it could benefit from improvement compared to other aspects of the university experience.

Among surveyed categories, internationality stands out with the highest rating at 4.30. Student life and location also received strong scores, both exceeding 4.25. Conversely, accommodation presented the lowest rating at 3.62. Facilities, professors, and value for money were rated in the mid-to-high 3s, indicating a generally positive, though not outstanding, performance in these areas.

Across several key areas, this institution garners exceptionally high ratings. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and value all received outstanding scores of 4.75. Location and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.5. This indicates a consistently positive experience for students, with its strongest attributes lying in its academic and residential offerings.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.

The university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~90.5% of reviews being favorable. Students praise the international opportunities, comprehensive curriculum, and professional development. A small fraction (~2.4%) of negative reviews cite issues with management and communication.

With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 48 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight outstanding teaching quality, practical courses, strong industry alignment, and excellent career services/alumni networks. One negative review mentioned high tuition fees.

With ~74% of reviews being positive, students praise the program's flexibility, international focus, and professionalizing opportunities. Some mention assignments being difficult to balance with revision. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nearly all (95%) of 20 university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, great facilities, and good teachers. A single negative review cited disappointment with practical tool training and professor engagement.

~95% of reviews are positive, praising the multicultural environment, practical curriculum, and strong alumni network. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions superficial course coverage and a lack of practical value.

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise approachable professors and practical, international learning experiences. Some note campus facilities and student life could be improved with more funding.

Rating distribution
5★
60%
50%
38%
28%
30%
31%
75%
4★
28%
41%
52%
44%
65%
53%
25%
3★
9%
7%
8%
28%
0%
11%
0%
2★
0%
1%
2%
0%
5%
3%
0%
1★
2%
1%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Enriching Experience

I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.

Nothing to show

Focus on multicultural business management

I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.

Nothing to show

Excellent Experience at IDRAC

I am a Chinese student and I completed my MBA in Business Engineering at IDRAC Business School and the experience has been excellent. The program fully met my expectations. The professors are very approachable, supportive, and always available. I truly appreciated the strong sense of guidance and personal support throughout the course. Highly recommended!

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close