emlyon business school vs ESDES School of Management vs IAE Lyon School of Management vs INSEEC Business School vs ILERI School of International Relations

Side-by-side comparison from 83 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: emlyon business school (4.40)
emlyon business school: wins 4/7 categories
ESDES School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
IAE Lyon School of Management: wins 1/7 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 1/7 categories
ILERI School of International Relations: wins 1/7 categories
EKLYA School Of Business: wins 0/7 categories
AMOS Sport Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Entrepreneurship
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Best programme: Conflict Resolution and Governance
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.16
Win
Not rated
3.50
3.57
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.54
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.62
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.05
Win
Not rated
3.50
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.56
Not rated
3.00
4.62
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.24
Not rated
4.00
4.10
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.40
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.76
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.94
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.25
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
  • +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
  • +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.

Nothing to show

  • +Small class sizes and ideal study conditions
  • +Diverse guest speakers from academic and entrepreneurial backgrounds
  • +Focus on innovative learning and support for student initiatives
  • +Skill development and career preparation
  • +Supportive and multicultural learning environment
  • +Practical application of knowledge
  • +Broad international focus and cross-cultural learning
  • +Strong professional development and recognized technical training
  • +Opportunities for networking and future connections

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Poor professor engagement and program support.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies.
  • -Lack of support and irrelevant course content.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and course content leads to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of responsiveness and clear communication from staff is a major complaint.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **Location**, achieving a perfect score, and a strong showing in **Student Life** with a 4. Its **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated moderately at 3.5. However, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** received the lowest scores, both at 3. Despite these areas for improvement, the university offers good **Value** at 4.

This institution garners high marks for its location and internationality, both scoring an impressive 4.62. Professors and student life also received solid ratings of 4.00 and 4.10 respectively. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, rated at 3.57, and accommodation, which received a 3.25. Value for money is assessed at 3.76, indicating a generally positive but not outstanding performance.

Overall, the university garners positive ratings, with **Student Life** and **Value** standing out as exceptional strengths. Professors and Internationality also received high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** appears to be the weakest area, with ratings for Facilities and Location also being moderate. The university presents a well-rounded offering, particularly excelling in student experience and perceived worth.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is largely positive. Reviews highlight ideal study conditions, particularly within master programs, and a strong focus on entrepreneurial initiatives.

With 16 out of 23 reviews being positive (~74%), students highlight strong program content and professional preparation. They appreciate skill development and practical application, alongside a friendly atmosphere and helpful professors.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~67% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students highlight excellent programs, a valuable international focus, and professional development opportunities. There is no negative feedback in this sample.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
58%
0%
50%
26%
33%
0%
0%
4★
29%
0%
0%
43%
33%
0%
0%
3★
11%
0%
50%
30%
33%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close